Snuffysasa
Member
Guys, I recommend avoid using terms like FSD and L4 and L5, because it is not clear what you actually mean.
This is the most likely Tesla rollout:
By end of 2017: there may be some 'FSD-like' features enabled, such as maybe stopping at stop signs and stoplights. However of course, human driver will still be required to keep eyes on-road and hands by wheel. So this is technically SAE Level 2.
By 2018: There will be many / most 'FSD' features enabled, this means that in perfect conditions a Tesla could drive a full trip autonomously. However of course, human driver will still be required to keep eyes on-road and hands by wheel. And there will be very frequent exceptions, where the human will need to intervene. And of course, some roads the system may not be able to handle, many weather and traffic conditions etc. So this is technically SAE Level 2.
2019-2020: Tesla continues to refine 'FSD' so that human interventions will be needed to the point of almost never. (Still SAE Level 2)
2020-2021-or beyond: Tesla could get to the point where they will enable 'driver-less autonomy' This is the point where the system becomes SAE Level 4, and at this point, Tesla will have to claim responsibility for accidents. At this point, and only at this point is there a question of will regulators allow this. The time-frame for this is most unclear, but I do not see the bottle neck as regulation/legality. I see the bigger bottleneck is just is the technology performing at a high enough level. Though I do think its very possible for AP 2 to be performing at above a human level in certain conditions: weather, mapped areas, types of roads etc.
Michigan and Cali already allow, 'driverless cars.'
And in all the other states where there is not specific ban on SDCs(most of them), then in this case driverless cars are already legal. But we could see many states pass bans on driverless cars, but I don't see it as a major barrier. The states and the feds will allow driverless cars if a company can show that it is a good choice.
This is the most likely Tesla rollout:
By end of 2017: there may be some 'FSD-like' features enabled, such as maybe stopping at stop signs and stoplights. However of course, human driver will still be required to keep eyes on-road and hands by wheel. So this is technically SAE Level 2.
By 2018: There will be many / most 'FSD' features enabled, this means that in perfect conditions a Tesla could drive a full trip autonomously. However of course, human driver will still be required to keep eyes on-road and hands by wheel. And there will be very frequent exceptions, where the human will need to intervene. And of course, some roads the system may not be able to handle, many weather and traffic conditions etc. So this is technically SAE Level 2.
2019-2020: Tesla continues to refine 'FSD' so that human interventions will be needed to the point of almost never. (Still SAE Level 2)
2020-2021-or beyond: Tesla could get to the point where they will enable 'driver-less autonomy' This is the point where the system becomes SAE Level 4, and at this point, Tesla will have to claim responsibility for accidents. At this point, and only at this point is there a question of will regulators allow this. The time-frame for this is most unclear, but I do not see the bottle neck as regulation/legality. I see the bigger bottleneck is just is the technology performing at a high enough level. Though I do think its very possible for AP 2 to be performing at above a human level in certain conditions: weather, mapped areas, types of roads etc.
Michigan and Cali already allow, 'driverless cars.'
And in all the other states where there is not specific ban on SDCs(most of them), then in this case driverless cars are already legal. But we could see many states pass bans on driverless cars, but I don't see it as a major barrier. The states and the feds will allow driverless cars if a company can show that it is a good choice.
Last edited: