TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

Is it just me that is disapointed by the cargo space!?

Discussion in 'Model 3' started by Dakkor, May 28, 2017.

  1. Mr X

    Mr X Future Owner

    Jan 18, 2013
    Simi Valley, CA
    I never use the trunk. All I do is drive my car and throw a few things hear and there in the backseat so I could care less about trunk space. All any type of space is going to do is simply collect dust until I clean it once every week.

    I'll take a Tesla with extra range or power if it could be put up front instead of frunk space. Really no need for a front trunk
  2. WileyTheMan

    WileyTheMan Peanut Gallery Member

    Apr 20, 2016
    Los Gatos, CA
    That don't confront me none. This car is replacing a Mustang as a daily commuter, which is not necessarily known as a great people or cargo mover. Even then, I could haul long items pretty well with the back seats down. We got a minivan for hauling.
  3. smilepak

    smilepak Active Member

    May 11, 2015
    Eastvale, CA
    I have a 2008 Lexus GS 350 and the trunk space is 14 cu ft. With this spec saying Frunk and Trunk combine being 14 cu ft, I am very disappointed. The thing I dislike about my Lexus have been the trunk space of lack there of.

    As a Model S owner, I am spoiled with that space and love the space. I know Model 3 wouldn't be big like Model S, but I would expect it to be at the very least larger than the Lexus I have. Turned out, it is smaller. Lol
  4. N5329K

    N5329K Active Member

    Aug 12, 2009
    #104 N5329K, Jun 6, 2017
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2017
    All designs are compromises. One of Tesla's greatest achievements is just how few compromises they designed into the Model S. It's a large sport sedan that's a blast to drive. It swallows cargo like a station wagon. It's beautiful on the outside and pretty darn nice on the inside, too.
    Tesla chose different design compromises for the Model 3. It's still beautiful on the outside (whoever is doing those clay models deserves a standing ovation). The inside is just adequate. maybe. It swallows cargo like a small-ish sedan. It will likely be a blast to drive, especially in performance optioned versions. It will be cheap to build in large quantities, earn the company a strong profit and help move the world of personal transportation in an electric direction.
    Different design compromises, different results.
  5. stopcrazypp

    stopcrazypp Well-Known Member

    Dec 8, 2007
    Well the Model 3 is an entire size class smaller than GS 350. Unless it was made into a hatch, the likelihood of it having a larger trunk is already slim in the first place. Model 3 has a stretched wheelbase which makes it worse too for trunk space.

    PRSIST Member

    Sep 27, 2016
    Yes you are! Nobody is forcing you to buy the Model 3!!! Why do people like you post negative comments about a car if the car doesn't meet their needs. If I go look at a Toyota Camry and it doesn't meet my needs, I'm not going to go out to a blog and gripe about it, I'm simply going to go find a car that suits me.
  7. Dakkor

    Dakkor Member

    Apr 25, 2015
    Lachenaie, Quebec, Canada
    Well that's some pretty much boring internet you got there.

    I guess the internet should be all about writing poem about flower and the sun.

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.