From where I sit, tftf was merely pointing out that this outcome is not a certainty. And guess what, it's not. A lot can happen between now and 2018, much as I believe in Tesla and believe they can keep up the jaw-dropping execution.
I don't think it's constructive to jump down the throat of anyone who has a differing take on Tesla's prospects. I, for one, would prefer a forum where we could exchange differing opinions civilly.
Exactly, I was simply trying to explain a different viewpoint using numbers: Damodaran is an independent academic (not a short-seller) and a noted expert on company valuation. I think it would be useful to have a detailed look at his blog entries, some people may not be familiar with the follow-up entry Damodaran wrote a few days after his initial two blog entries on TSLA, it's linked above.
I was not here to pick fights. On a "fan" forum such as this one, I assume 90%+ of people are probably long TSLA, however: This can lead to a dangerous herd thinking and over-optimistic group mentality regarding TSLA's valuation and outlook, especially after the run TSLA already had in 2013.
It may be useful to hear a dissenting voice. Damodaran (which I frequently linked here) knows a thing or two about valuation. This doesn't mean you have to follow him (or anyone else) blindly - but I think he presented more useful number crunching and deeper analysis than most analysts covering TSLA's valuation - long or short. And it's all available for free on his blog. But apparently that's "trolling". Does this mean Professor Damodaran is (also) a troll, since I'm just linking to his numbers ?
With that said and no intention to start arguments: 42 entries were enough to present my points and point to a few links with (imho) red flags regarding TSLA's current market valuation. So long and thanks for all the
fish arguments! We will see in a few year.
PS: @JRP3. I have been in the markets long enough not to get emotional over trading or investment opportunities. I never marry a stock, a new opportunity comes along each and every day in the markets.
PPS: @PeterJA. I was just pointing out size and production differences in the car market, not implying TSLA would be the largest manufacturer by 2017. I know that's impossible, in fact that is one my arguments: the car market is very different than, say, the IT market where a disruptor such as GOOG or AAPL can disrupt the sector in just 3-5 years with a new search engine or mobile phone. For example, it took all the Japanese and Korean car manufacturers
aggregated (even with hidden and open subsidies from the governments in Japan and South Korea!)a few
decades, not just a few years, to mount a successful assault on Detroit...
2000: GOOG marketshare in search engines
2005: GOOG marketshare in search engines
2008: AAPL marketshare in smartphones
2013: AAPL marketshare in smarthones
2013: TSLA marketshare in cars
2018: TSLA marketshare in cars
I will let you fill in the numbers...
@PeterJA: Regarding the $68 billion and cost of capital. I already noted above why I think Damodaran's default cost of capital numbers are appropriate and the low 1.5% yield in May 2013 was only possible because the yield was linked to a convertible bond, not a "normal" corporate bond, again here:
Short-Term TSLA Price Movements - Page 1055