The article below lists the base mission E as having 400 kW. Is that comparable to a Model S 40 (if that existed)?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The article below lists the base mission E as having 400 kW. Is that comparable to a Model S 40 (if that existed)?
They sound similar, but kw measures power, like horsepower... while kwh measures capacity, like gallons.
Its a horrible article. Lots of people are strangely desperate to see someone/something 'kill' tesla. Everything's a Tesla killer in these articles.The misinformation is real in this one. I've seen the Mission E and it's barely bigger than what a Model 3 is, and certainly not a full size luxury saloon.
Maybe because you're comparing an entry level rep-mobile (C43 is just a C450, not a true AMG product or remotely model S like) to your $90,000 tesla.A German car is a German car. Just traded in our 2013 X-3 for a 2018 Mercedes C-43 convertible, a gorgeous car, but still miles behind our 2015 S85D in performance, electronics, dealer and delivery experience, etc.
Nope, that’s not it at all.Maybe because you're comparing an entry level rep-mobile (C43 is just a C450, not a true AMG product or remotely model S like) to your $90,000 tesla.
Go drive an E63 AMG S, RS7 or M5 and then compare performance and technology.
The sad thing is that many people feel the Tesla Semi and Roadster 2020 are vapourware. Vapourware that Tesla offered passenger rides with, no less.Until their VAG/MB/BM charging network is up and running those companies will keep teasing ugly concept cars which are basically vapourware to stop loyal customers from jumping ship to a Model S/X.