You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Personally I think buyers of the new AP are getting a better deal than EAP buyers. TACC and Autosteer can be real stress relievers if you often drive in bumper-to-bumper traffic or make long highway trips. Summon, Autopark and NoA are mostly party tricks with little practical value in my experience, and are not very reliable. After playing around with them a bit initially, I never use them now.Early adopters of the Model 3 that opted out of EAP. Now more affordable ($4,000 more doable for me than the earlier $7,000) for the upgrade without Navigate on Auto Pilot, summon and parking. Worth it or not. Go...
I use N-0n-A whenever I can. Have used summon once and never used Autopark.Personally I think buyers of the new AP are getting a better deal than EAP buyers. TACC and Autosteer can be real stress relievers if you often drive in bumper-to-bumper traffic or make long highway trips. Summon, Autopark and NoA are mostly party tricks with little practical value in my experience, and are not very reliable. After playing around with them a bit initially, I never use them now.
Why do you use NOA instead of the autodrive? All it adds is an indicator that you should change lanes and does it for you once you initiate the indicator. If it changed lanes and all that jazz by itself, that's one thing.. but if you still have to manually intervene, where's the value?I use N-0n-A whenever I can. Have used summon once and never used Autopark.
When traveling long distances, N-on-A is just a better version of Autosteer, plus the car rarely get confused passing freeway exits.
I do like having access to basic summon, because when you need it, you'll really need it.
I don't see any real need for advanced summon, but some people will benefit from it.
I'm seriously considering paying the $3K for FSD (from EAP) to get the faster computer and get access to red light and stop sign detection.
Personally I think buyers of the new AP are getting a better deal than EAP buyers. TACC and Autosteer can be real stress relievers if you often drive in bumper-to-bumper traffic or make long highway trips. Summon, Autopark and NoA are mostly party tricks with little practical value in my experience, and are not very reliable. After playing around with them a bit initially, I never use them now.
Why do you use NOA instead of the autodrive? All it adds is an indicator that you should change lanes and does it for you once you initiate the indicator. If it changed lanes and all that jazz by itself, that's one thing.. but if you still have to manually intervene, where's the value?
Why do you use NOA instead of the autodrive? All it adds is an indicator that you should change lanes and does it for you once you initiate the indicator. If it changed lanes and all that jazz by itself, that's one thing.. but if you still have to manually intervene, where's the value?
Supposedly it will be able to do lane changes without intervention soon. The problem in my view is that the lane change recommendations suck. They are usually too late, too early, or just plain unnecessary, and in somewhat heavier traffic NoA is often unable to change lanes at all because it isn't assertive enough. Navigating interchanges sucks too, especially the cloverleaf variety (where it usually drives way too slow if it works at all). It is of course possible that they will improve it to a point where it becomes useful. If they ever get to the point where it can drive unsupervised that would be really cool. I have my doubts though.Why do you use NOA instead of the autodrive? All it adds is an indicator that you should change lanes and does it for you once you initiate the indicator. If it changed lanes and all that jazz by itself, that's one thing.. but if you still have to manually intervene, where's the value?
i have EAP and ive played around with NOA, but i don't use it. i'll just use autopilot and exit myself when it's time.1) Why not? With EAP, N-on-A is a free extra feature.
2) It does successfully navigate most freeway interchanges
3) The manual intervention is quite minimal. You can ignore the suggestion or take it. Just lightly press the indicator stalk to accept the suggestion.
4) Did you miss the point I made about highway exits? With N-on-A, the car knows to ignore ambiguous highway exits.
TACC is totally worth the cost of the new AP option. But people on a budget may certainly forgo it, as if you have never used a “smart” cruise control feature before it may be difficult to envision just how useful it is.Early adopters of the Model 3 that opted out of EAP. Now more affordable ($4,000 more doable for me than the earlier $7,000) for the upgrade without Navigate on Auto Pilot, summon and parking. Worth it or not. Go...
Navigate on Auto Pilot will continue to improve and in time will truly be “Full Self Driving”. That could happen as soon as the end of this year. What it does right now is just the first iteration.Why do you use NOA instead of the autodrive? All it adds is an indicator that you should change lanes and does it for you once you initiate the indicator. If it changed lanes and all that jazz by itself, that's one thing.. but if you still have to manually intervene, where's the value?
so if that's the case and i have EAP, spending 3k on the ability to see red lights and stop signs is not worth it.Navigate on Auto Pilot will continue to improve and in time will truly be “Full Self Driving”. That could happen as soon as the end of this year. What it does right now is just the first iteration.
When Auto Pilot first came out in late 2015 it was primitive compared to what it does now, 3 1/2 years later. And what we have now will seem primitive a few years from now.
Tesla agreesAt $4,000 not worth it for me. I would probably buy it if it was $1,500 or $2,000