We know that
@Tech_Guy has a ~100 HP loss.
We know that everyone's car has these incrementing counters.
Is anyone else with a car of similar mileage / vehicle age / counter values measuring a similar power loss? Greater? Less?
With a single data point it is impossible to verify what could be a possible counter-initiated downgrade and what could be an unrelated battery pack fault.
Given that we're about to make a pack of lawyers (even) richer it would be really useful if others can provide hard data on this.
To paraphrase Matt Damon, can we science the s**t out of this?
I am all for sciencing the s**t out of this. In the meanwhile I must add, we also have Tesla saying
@Tech_Guy's power loss is due to the counters. We know that, unless we assume
@Tech_Guy told a lie.
Is it theoretically possible Tesla's reading of the logs is wrong/incomplete (now there's
a topic...), sure it is. Is it possible
@Tech_Guy lies or misunderstood? Theoretically, of course.
But at the moment the latest word we know of, from Tesla, regarding
@Tech_Guy's 100 hp P90DL power loss is: counters.
100 hp power loss is no longer about downgrading 10.8 to 10.9 quarter mile. As said, it is about degrading a P90DL below Insane mode.
This thread started out with hopeful notions that any such power limiter would be hardly noticeable, but I still maintain my question: how could it be. If you run the wire bonds (or whatnot) to a limit on full, how could a very small, incremental hp decrease suddenly make enough difference. Nothing so far suggests that the power limiter would be insignificant, except maybe wishful thinking.
Mind you, I'm not saying the response to the counters is necessarily 100 hp. That is speculative. I am just adding to the raw data: Right or wrong, so far we have data that Tesla does say it is related to the counters and have refused/passed on additional chances to add to/change that information to
@Tech_Guy.