You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Personal preference. Even if you do decide to get PPF, you have to decide what part of the car. I personally went with just the front bumper and lights. Give me a little peace of mind. I had that professionally installed since I failed at my attempt.
I did the rear pillar myself as that was pretty easy. I also would recommend ceramic coating your Tesla.
You can have both but they are different things altogether. PPF is just that it protects the paint. It is thicker (and has some self-healing properties). Ceramic does not really protect the paint from rocks or debris, but helps your paint look last longer. It does protect from the UV rays the sun produces that can dull your paint. Ceramic over PPF does a similar thing protecting the PPF from the sun. PPF is a film put on the car, ceramic is a liquid coating.Thanks for all responses. It seems PPF is important.
But PPF or Ceremic coating? Or can you really have both (very expensive for both?) ?
It's only important if paint chips is something that really bothers you and if you have the budget for it. Just to get the front bumper done is going to run you around $500+Thanks for all responses. It seems PPF is important.
But PPF or Ceremic coating? Or can you really have both (very expensive for both?) ?
6k was worth every penny for me, absolutely love how my car looks....but like you said its all about preference.Yeps, all about preference. $5K is not worth it for me but $600 for the front and lights is a good enough balance for me.
PPF is overrated in my opinion. Paying $5k+ is not worth it on a 60k vehicle. Also, I don't think it adds much value when you sell.