Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Papafox's Daily TSLA Trading Charts

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Screen Shot 2019-01-23 at 8.04.52 PM.png

Today we had a couple pieces of news:
* RBC Capital downgraded TSLA on fears of slower growth. The irony here is that Tesla exited 2018 with about 3-4X the production rate of the beginning of the year. I think the FUD side of this downgrade is an assumption that a 7% layoff will mean slower growth when in reality it is likely right-sizing the number of employees who are excess due to shifting of M3 deliveries away from U.S. and continued efficiency improvements.
* Bloomberg put out a story about S&X production hours being cut back (which makes perfect sense since 75kwh versions dropped while we wait to hear what Tesla's replacement plan is), and then Bloomberg followed up with a huge dip story for today's trading, suggesting that investors are worried about falling demand. Fortunately, Tesla put out a suitable rebuttal to the Bloomberg article and suggested that details will be shared at the 4Q CC and production can be ramped back up when it is appropriate.

These stories are somewhat balanced out by yesterday's Goldman negative note

Now, let's look at the differences and similarities in trading between yesterday and today

................Yesterday.............Today
Volume:........12 million...........12 million
NASDAQ:.......Down nearly 2%.........neutral
FUD:.............yes...................yes
TSLA perform:..Down 1.11%...........Down 3.79%
short % sell:....55%...................62%
uptick rule:.....yes...................no
.

Digest these numbers and you realize that TSLA's performance relative to the NASDAQ changed for the worst by about 4.5%. I don't want to sound like a broken record, but to my eyes the big difference between the two days is the removal of the alternate uptick rule today, which inspired the shorts to put in one of their biggest efforts to force the SP down and extend the dip for yet another day.

Taking a look at the daily chart above, you can see the mandatory morning dip, the typical recovery from the dip, and then tough sledding in the afternoon, even though the NASDAQ was recovering in the afternoon.

As with yesterday, volume of 12 million suggests plenty of longs were selling. I think that the Friday announcement by Tesla has some of the investors worried because they don't yet understand why Tesla has announced lower profits in Q4 than in Q3. They don't understand why the S & X 75 kwh models have been terminated. I believe the 4Q ER has lots of opportunity to remove concerns.

jan23nas600.png

The NASDAQ dipped into noon and recovered to slightly over the break even point today. The DOW gained 171.

jan23short.png

Short-sellers were tagged with a robust 62% of TSLA selling today, indicating lots of manipulations (no surprise)

jan23tech.png

Looking at the tech chart, you can see that although TSLA dipped below the lower bb, it closed within the bb. The implication is that this dip should be getting close to bottoming out. These prices are very attractive this close to a 4Q ER that will certainly report a profit and perhaps will give positive explanations for what is happening at TSLA, with encouraging guidance for the full year 2019. The counter-argument is that shorts really threw lots of resources at TSLA today and if macros are weak tomorrow they'll try for more. No guarantees on timing, so please, if you have some dry powder, watch for the turnaround rather than catching falling knives. Remember than TSLA has historically run from upper to lower bb and then back again on an amazingly frequent basis. Once TSLA reverses and begins heading up again, watch the traders who bailed in the past couple of days get back in again and contribute to a faster recovery.

If you're sitting on your investment like most of us, keep in mind that Tesla has the most compelling new car the auto market has seen in a century. The profit in selling a SR Model 3 should only be about $1500 less than a MR with the same configuration. Costs are coming down as Grohmann machinery is installed and a multitude of improvements are made each quarter. Costs per vehicle also decrease as production continues to increase, due to economies of scale. Tesla has lots of plans that make sense but haven't been announced yet. Serious competition to Tesla's vehicles has yet to materialize. Better days lay ahead.

Conditions:
* Dow up 171 (0.70%)
* NASDAQ up 5 (0.08%)
* TSLA 287.59, down 11.33 (3.79%)
* TSLA volume 12.5M shares
* Oil 52.40
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 62%
 
Last edited:
View attachment 371344
... The profit in selling a SR Model 3 should only be about $1500 less than a MR with the same configuration. ...
Not sure how you get $1500. But the number implies that a SR M3 priced at $35k has the same 20% gross margin with a MR priced at $44k. ($44k * 20% - $1.5k)/$35k = 21%.
4Q ER could also be a risky time - if earnings drop too much (say M3 asp drops $5k) or the concerns of demands are not dispatched.
 
As a rough guess of SR vs. MR profitability, I used $4K as price difference and $2.5 as cost of the cells that would not be needed in SR. That $2.5K might be too high, though, because I was looking at difference between 75kwh and 50 kwh (difference between LR and SR). If the cost savings on cells is more like $1.3K, then the profit difference would be more like $2.7K. In either instance, that difference can be made up by efficiency improvements.
 
  • Helpful
  • Informative
Reactions: AZRI11 and madodel
jan24chart.png

Today was a hugely important trading day for various reasons. First, we learned this morning that yesterday's big dip nonetheless included net COVERING by shorts of more than 800,000 shares. The old short-seller mantra of "Tesla is a zero" used to lead to an increase in short interest on these big dips as shorts increased short interest in anticipation of a ride to zero. No longer. Instead, picture one of those old gangster movies in which Mugsy is saying, "Cover me, while I make a break for it!" That's exactly what was happening on Wednesday as TSLA lost $11. While the short-seller manipulators were busy creating a lot of red with their 62% of short-tagged TSLA selling and then extricating their daily shorting activities through covering by day's end, we saw net BUYING by shorts of more than 800,000 shares.

Here are my computations:
Data from Ihor Dusaniwsky's "short-sight" email
morning of 1/23 19.89% short percentage of TSLA float
morning of 1/24 19.26% short percentage of TSLA float
That's a change of 0.63% in just one day
0.0063 x 128M shares = 806,400 shares drop in short interest on Wednesday

The bottom line is that the shorts are no longer willing to bet that TSLA will continue to fall. Rather, more and more shorts are getting out, even on days when the SP is falling. The short-sellers who are manipulating make money on days like yesterday but lose on days like today, and there's no sign the manipulators are backing off. They have nothing to worry about because the SEC is giving a red carpet pass to manipulate to their hearts content with TSLA and nothing will ever come of it.

The second reason why today was an important trading day for TSLA is that there are indications that we've bottomed out from this dip and it's time to turn around. Of course nothing is certain, and if macros misbehave tomorrow anything is possible, but just look at today's trading. With no substantial news released, TSLA dipped in pre-market trading as shorts apparently prepared for another Mandatory Morning Dip. Their MMD lasted all of 15 minutes before it was defeated. Normally, the SP will rally after a defeat of the MMD, but it didn't do so today because the shorts were busy throwing resources at TSLA with the 59% of selling tagged to them, and a game of "whack-the-mole" continued almost exactly four hours before the shorts ran out of ammo and the SP began its climb. Why were longs successful in defeating the "whack-the-mole" play by shorts at around 2pm today? Take a look at the NASDAQ chart below. The climb created too much reason for bidding TSLA up as that NASDAQ climb ran from 1pm until closing. Shorts were simply defeated by a combination of macros, lack of believable FUD, and a stock price which is potentially a bargain this close to the 4Q ER.

jan24nas600.png


The NASDAQ spent the whole day in green territory and closed up 0.68%

Where do we go tomorrow? Remember that there are lots of traders who bailed from TSLA when it started falling quickly on Friday. Those traders who believe this dip was an overreaction (remember the tailwind from the huge option expirations that day?) will be getting back into TSLA. We should also expect to see net short covering between today and Jan 30. Thus, once there's an indication that TSLA has turned around, it could potentially rise quite quickly. Remember the "potentially" part, because the macros and news will of course play a role in what transpires during the coming 4 trading days.

jan24short.png

Shorts are tagged with selling 59% of TSLA today, a hefty number suggesting lots of manipulations. I think the reason for such high manipulations is that the shorts really want to keep TSLA below 360 during the critical trading days of February so that TSLA cannot deliver part of the March note repayment in stock. The whole idea is to slow TSLA down as much as possible and anything that reduces cash on hand has a hand in assisting a slowdown in growth.


jan24tech.png

Looking at the tech chart, you can see a typical bounce off the lower bollinger band setup for a turnaround. Once TSLA reaches the lower bb, there's expectations it will reverse and start heading higher. Notice how robust the initial rise was on the previous two lower bb reversals.

Conditions:
* Dow down 22 (0.09%)
* NASDAQ up 48 (0.68%)
* TSLA 291.51 up 3.92 (1.36%)
* TSLA volume 8.0M shares
* Oil 53.08
* Percent of selling tagged to TSLA shorts: 59%
 
Last edited:
jan25chart.png

Today TSLA continued its recovery bounce off the lower bollinger band. Solid macros once again helped TSLA climb. I also computed that over 410,000 short shares were covered yesterday, furthering the retreat of shorts from TSLA and making the job of the manipulators more difficult. Nonetheless, fully 62% of TSLA selling today was tagged to the shorts, which suggests a serious level of effort to keep TSLA from climbing higher. I feel confident that TSLA would have climbed quite a bit more without the significant shorting in big clumps and then covering in small purchases to minimize effect.

Looking at the chart, you can see an anemic mandatory morning dip attempt at opening, likely effort needed to hold TSLA back as it rallied after the MMD effort, and a dip that bottomed out about 11am (2nd MMD attempt) that was not supported by any movement of the NASDAQ. I think the shorts were ready to take advantage of any weakness in the NASDAQ as the day went on, but the NASDAQ never dipped substantially enough to get a dip on steroids going at TSLA, and so the shorts lost yet another round as manipulators lost money for day two in a row.

jan25nas.png

The NASDAQ rose 1.29% today and never gave the shorts an excuse to push TSLA down


jan25short.png

Fully 62% of TSLA selling was tagged as short today, suggesting a desperate attempt by shorts to sidetrack this rally before the reversal from the lower bb bounce became too apparent to traders.


jan25tech.png

The tech chart shows a very nice beginning of an uptrend following the lower bb bounce. Clearly, with the percentage of selling tagged as short today, shorts had another idea in mind.

Elon's mom, Maye Musk agrees with Papafox that TSLA is being manipulated by the shorts and the media. Nice to be in such good company. It's fair to say that Elon surely agrees with his mom on this point but is best off not commenting about it on Twitter.

For the week, TSLA closed at 297.04, down 5.22 from last Friday's 302.26. The important thing, though, is that TSLA was on the toboggan run downhill last Friday and this Friday is climbing for the second day in a row. Up sure feels better than down! Have a great weekend, and let's look forward to hearing all the details about Tesla's plans at next week's ER and conference call.

Conditions:
* Dow up 184 (0.75%)
* NASDAQ up 91 (1.29%)
* TSLA 297.04, up 5.53 (1.90%)
* TSLA volume 7.9M shares
* Oil 53.69
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to short-sellers: 62%
 
jan28chart.JPG

Today we had an opportunity to see a negative macro day during TSLA's bounce off the lower bb recovery. Overall, TSLA outperformed the market and probably would have closed up if not for extraordinary efforts by short-sellers. About 10am TSLA went big on its mandatory morning dip, descending to the high 280s before quickly rising and showing the taletake "icicle" of a manufactured dip. Macros were still sour, though, so instead of a climb into the green immediately after the MMD, TSLA slowly worked its way toward the green. Alas, the NASDAQ took a mini-dip that bottomed out about noon, and that was all the excuse the shorts needed for generating another breathtaking cliff-dive of TSLA that also bottomed out around noon. Once again, TSLA recovered and then spent the remainder of the day in a game of "whack-the-mole" as shorts worked to keep TSLA from closing green (would have been a huge defeat). They managed to keep TSLA down 66 cents for the day, that's all.

Overall, the negative story the bears are selling these days is that TSLA's profits keep declining and by Q1 they will be negative or near zero. As the mix of Model 3s changes to lower margin models, TSLA will continue to show worse performances until some day Elon Musk is spotted panhandling on a Palo Alto street corner. The much more likely scenario is that with the current China tariffs in place and with some reduction in Chinese buying, TSLA has seen some decrease in demand, but not enough to interfere with Model 3's expansion. Today Bloomberg reported the highest Model 3 production outlook to date, with projected output heading upwards toward 6K/wk now. Expect Tesla to continue expanding Model 3 production beyond 6K/wk and hopefully reaching at least 7K/wk in Q1. As production increases, Tesla benefits both from higher revenue and lower costs (due to efficiencies of scale). Meanwhile, labor required to produce the Model 3s keeps declining. It's exactly what is needed to make the basic $35000 Tesla profitable later this year.

Here's the thing, though. It's not really about profits, if you're looking at Tesla's health, but rather it's about cash flow. Remember that one of the differences between cash flow and profits are depreciating the equipment that has already been paid for through equity raises. This is where the bears really miss the boat. We'll see over a billion dollars of free cash flow in Q4 even though the quarter shows a smaller profit than Q3. We'll see tremendous positive cash flow generated in Q1, but most if not all will be used to pay off the March 900M note. So, look at TSLA from a cash flow standpoint and the company takes one quarter out to pay off a note and then resumes adding funds to the bank account. At some point in 2019, likely Q2, profits begin to increase again. Bears want you to believe that profit equates to cash flow (which is totally ridiculous) and that since Q3 to Q4 to Q1 will be a declining profit line, TSLA is in trouble. Truth of the matter is that Tesla has turned the corner on cash flow and will be growing stronger financially every quarter, and once the March note is paid off, the small dent in cash on hand during Q1 will be realized to be no big deal.

Recently, more than one analyst has downgraded TSLA because of the combined threat of decreasing demand and the company's "cash burn" problems. These analysts should be fired because they are incompetent. Tesla is creating cash at a rate of about a billion per quarter and will do so for the foreseeable future (with the exception that in Q1 TSLA has to use some or all of that quarter's cash created to pay off the March note. I think Elon has made a point to go for profitability (although it's rather unimportant for a growth stock with lots of cash created each quarter) because he wants to get the shorts off his back and in doing so get the media off his back too. All of that negative media coverage has a negative effect upon the company, and life will be much better after most of the shorts go bye-bye. I think there will be surprise when Elon and Depak lay out the cash-creation that Tesla should perform in 2019 when they speak on Wednesday.

As more and more Model 3s go overseas or enter inventory for sales, the delay in receiving funds for payment will have some negative effect upon cash flow. Let me check with some experts and give you all a bit more information about how this works at a later date.

jan28nas.jpg

The NASDAQ closed down 1.11% after opening more than 1% low. Two dips that bottomed out near 10am and noon led TSLA shorts to manufacture big dips that bottomed out at each of these time points.

jan28short.jpg

TSLA shorts were tagged with 61% of TSLA selling today. How else do you think that 10am and that noon dip could have been so big?


jan28ihor.JPG

Here's Ihor Dusaniwsky's latest chart of how he expects TSLA short interest changed during the month of January. The substantial short covering we saw on Wednesday and Thursday is included in the chart.



jan28tech.jpg

Looking at the tech chart, you can see that today's negative macros turned out to be a big nothing-burger for TSLA. Here's hoping we see positive macros going forward this week so that TSLA can at least be above 300 going into the ER.

Conditions:
* Dow down 209 (0.84%)
* NASDAQ down 79 (1.11%)
* TSLA 296.38, down 0.66 (0.22%)
* TSLA volume 6.4M shares
* Oil 52.09
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 61%
 
Last edited:
These shorts are really a disgusting disease to planet Earth. All they do is polluting twitter with false info and BS “analysis”.
The Tesla world will be such a better place without people like Mark BS.
But Tesla should not be too distracted by them. The mission is always paramount.
Elon is smart, and with Larry Ellison’s help, I expect the long-waited short squeeze will happen sometime this year.
 
I expect the long-waited short squeeze will happen sometime this year.
Elon did promise the short squeeze of the century, but unfortunately not the short squeeze of 2018... Or even 2019.

The trouble is Tesla's valuation is based on expected future earnings. So a small change those expectations creates a big move in valuation. And especially with a lunatic with little hands pretending to run a superpower bent on new trade 'deals', I expect the rollercoaster ride to continue. There's plenty of ammo for the shorts to keep firing.

I am very much looking forward to the prophsized squeeze, but given Elon time and the macro conditions right now, it feels like we're waiting for the second coming of Christ: It could be any day now, but the statistical probability is low.

Should see a bit of a boost from the ER after the recent massacre though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mobius484
=> this dip from $296 (11h35) to $290 (11h50) was related to the news about the Saudis hedging most of its 4.9 percent stake in Tesla : Saudi Arabia's PIF slashes exposure to Tesla: FT

Just for info.

That's a fair point. I should have said shorts and FUD. The article about Saudi Arabia's PIF buying puts was indeed FUD because the title says that the organization "slashes exposure to Tesla", which, when read by algobots and quick readers, suggests that the organization has been massively selling its TSLA shares. The reality was quite different, which would then account for the quick recovery. In many ways, a deep selling event by shorts and FUD are very similar in that they are both intended to project a false reality (massive selling by longs, in the case of an icicle selling event). The other connection between short selling events and FUD is that shorts will typically pile onto a piece of FUD in order to give it traction. We don't know what percentage of the selling on the downside of the FUD was shorts and what was longs, but I'd bet that shorts were heavily involved.
 
jan29chart.JPG


Today was much like yesterday in that the NASDAQ was trading negatively and efforts were extended by shorts to keep TSLA from running into the green. On opening, buying enthusiasm led to a short rally but when the NASDAQ did a dive starting at about 10:20am, TSLA followed and with help from you-know-who TSLA bottomed out about 11am with slightly more loss than than NASDAQ. Once the NAS started to recover, though, TSLA headed higher and the shorts needed to play "whack-the-mole" for about an hour before they lost the ability to hold TSLA in the red.

Notice the bumps higher in after hours trading. AAPL released good news in their ER about 4:30pm and you can see some small spikes. Then Tesla unveiled a new pricing structure for Models S and X, and between the two TSLA climbed higher.

jan29nas.jpg

The NASDAQ dipped about 1% in the first hour and a half and then moved little

If you'd like to see details of the new S & X pricing, please see the Model S configurator . The bottom line is that the 100kwh battery has likely become the default battery right now for both the S & X. The new S & Xs are priced higher than the 75kwh variations but less than the 100s. Although Tesla likely has more in store for the S & X later this year, this move rationalizes the Tesla lineup. The extra cells needed to give the S 310 miles of range probably don't cost much more than $2,500, and so Tesla can make more money selling the basic S (or X) rather than the 75. It's a vehicle that offers more value than what it replaces (near 100kwh range and performance at a lower price), and so the change gives buyers an incentive to pull the trigger. Simultaneously, Tesla has simplified the product lineup. Both these changes should be positives for the company as it likely has some type of reworking at the factory that involves the S and/or X production lines. Perhaps we'll hear more Wednesday afternoon.

You may want to look at KarenRei's post about Bloomberg Model 3 tracker. Basically, the tracker is giving a 13 week backward view number of Model 3 production. The number has been rising but the tracker doesn't give us much info on what's currently happening. Behold, though changing some code you can view the weekly numbers, which extend too high otherwise and need to be cut off. Some TMC followers were suggesting the new weekly numbers would be pushing 10,000/wk when you compare the heights of those weekly lines to the heights of the 6,000/wk line. My best guess is that we're nowhere that high, but that Bloomberg realized the current numbers were way too low, due to some very nice increases in production during the past month, and so they have put in some overly high weekly numbers to bring the running total to a more reasonable number. In any event, the takeaway is that Bloomberg is realizing that Tesla has indeed been increasing Model 3 production this month, and that's a good thing.


jan29short.jpg

Finally we're seeing a decrease in the serious short manipulations with a somewhat less absurd 57% today. That number still suggests plenty of manipulations, but it's nice to see the decrease. One possible reason? We've been seeing short covering between a little below 400,000 shares/day in recent sessions to as high as 800,000 shares/day. Shorts are obviously getting out prior to the 4Q ER. If the manipulators also happen to be the shorts getting out, then once they have extracted themselves, in my dreams I hope we would see less in the way of manipulations. We'll see, but don't hold your breath.

jan29tech3.jpg

Looking at the tech chart, I included a wider view to put everything into better perspective. The upper bb is at 363, and so we have lots of room to run higher if the ER surprises to the up side. On the other hand, the lower bb is at 277, which would help limit any dip if the news is disappointing. Overall I am hopeful that Elon and Depak's explanations of what is transpiring at Tesla will calm the investors and help us recover ground lost after the announcement about 4Q and 1Q earnings being lower. The market doesn't like uncertainty and this ER could be critical for the two to lay out the plan for a nicely profitably 2019.

As always, it is best to keep your trading horizons fairly long with this stock. We were all surprised how gaming of the Q4 Production and Delivery analyst numbers allowed a miss to be declared when in reality we were thrilled with the numbers. With the high manipulations we've seen since the beginning of the year, I wouldn't relax and make too many short-term assumptions until we have more information from Tesla and they demonstrate that they can indeed hit the numbers they forecast.

Although TSLA has been outperforming the NASDAQ recently, it was good to see investors get the mojo to actually push us into the green today. We're going into the ER with a desire to push this SP higher and weakening abilities of the shorts to prevent it, both of which are good things.

Conditions:
* Dow up 52 (0.21%)
* NASDAQ down 57 (0.81%)
* TSLA 297.46, up 1.08 (0.36%)
* TSLA volume 4.6M shares
* Oil $53.20
 
@Papafox you may have touched on this in one of your posts, but with the recent sandbagging by bearish analysts and your findings of huge short covering numbers it occurred to me that these two events could be directly related. The analysts artificially suppress the share price in order for their institutional buddies to exit comfortably.

This is obviously manipulation and like the previous hunches there is little we can do unless we sue or get someone on the inside of one of the financial giants to uncover the practice. Any thoughts?
 
@Papafox you may have touched on this in one of your posts, but with the recent sandbagging by bearish analysts and your findings of huge short covering numbers it occurred to me that these two events could be directly related. The analysts artificially suppress the share price in order for their institutional buddies to exit comfortably.

This is obviously manipulation and like the previous hunches there is little we can do unless we sue or get someone on the inside of one of the financial giants to uncover the practice. Any thoughts?

Yes, there are lots of suspicious behaviors out there such as you mention, but unfortunately the SEC is on permanent vacation. I think we need a smoking gun to get the SEC to do any type of prosecution. Hoping we find something strong enough to get the wheels turning.