Here's what SOS Blinken said on ABC's “This Week” on Sunday.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's what SOS Blinken said on ABC's “This Week” on Sunday.
Do N. Korea and China use Soviet sized artillery shells? I'm guessing yes, but I don't know that.
wow the sack of potatoes to a dead Russian's family is a real thing. smh
A long-ago girl friend disliked a waitress and left a penny tip. The waitress threw it at her.That's more insulting than giving nothing. It's like having a $100 meal at a restaurant and leaving a $1 tip. It makes it clear the person thought of tipping, just couldn't be bothered to leave anything appropriate. If nothing was left there is the possibility the person forgot or they left cash and it was swiped, but leaving a paltry tip sends a different message.
I think that is why they do the sack of potatoes; too heavy to easily throw the entire bag at anyone.A long-ago girl friend disliked a waitress and left a penny tip. The waitress threw it at her.
So they hit Crimea, again.
It's an open secret that the US has not produced ATACMS in a few years. They have been working on a replacement, but it isn't ready for production yet. The US was concerned initially about giving Ukraine anything that could hit Russian sovereign territory, but once that hurdle (Ukraine has shown they will not use US made weapons over the border) was overcome there was the problem that the US arsenal doesn't have a lot of ATACMS and there will be no more of them.
Earlier this year a solution to fire Tomahawk missiles from a land based platform was worked out. The Tomahawk has a similar range and payload to the ATACMS and the USN has a lot of them in inventory. The Army probably wanted to be sure that the Tomahawk solution was going to work before they were willing to release the ATACMS for export.
When the ATACMS run out, the Tomahawk solution will probably be in production and the US will probably provide Tomahawks.
I'm not sure, but I think the adaptation is for Tomahawks to be fired with the same system as the ATACMS. I could be wrong though. It might be a naval Tomahawk firing tube mounted on a truck.
Here Musk says that Starlink was not allowed to be activated in Crimea as Russia(which included Crimea) was under sanction by the US government:Elon Musk biographer admits suggestion SpaceX head blocked Ukraine drone attack was wrong
Walter Isaacson’s book had ‘mistakenly’ said mogul secretly told engineers to turn off Starlink coverage of the Crimean coastwww.theguardian.com
Ukraine actually owns the small island off the coast of Russia so really the entire strait between Ukraine and Russia is in Ukrainian waters. The island was the source of many attempts by Russia to strong arm (steal) territory. One of the current UAF generals was stationed there and was taken prisoner and this was pre 2014. It has been to some international tribunal already and it was agreed that the island was Ukraine.For many targets Tomahawks will be as useful as Storm Shadow or Neptune, and the Western magazine depth is far greater with Tomahawk. However there are some specific targets that are heavily defended by S400 batteries and these would be a lot easier to go after with ATACMS. The most important of these is the Kerch bridge, where helpfully the most important bits are in Ukraine territorial waters. Whilst Neptune/StormShadow/etc have snuck past S400 from time to time, it would be a lot easier with ATACMS. Both the matter of the getting past the S400 and then doing the right amount of damage on impact.
================
Some more factual clarification on the Starlink issue. It happens to confirm what I have previously said as being correct. (I'm not defending Musk btw, he still misunderstands the category difference between defence and aggression).
Elon Musk biographer admits suggestion SpaceX head blocked Ukraine drone attack was wrong
Walter Isaacson’s book had ‘mistakenly’ said mogul secretly told engineers to turn off Starlink coverage of the Crimean coastwww.theguardian.com
For many targets Tomahawks will be as useful as Storm Shadow or Neptune, and the Western magazine depth is far greater with Tomahawk. However there are some specific targets that are heavily defended by S400 batteries and these would be a lot easier to go after with ATACMS. The most important of these is the Kerch bridge, where helpfully the most important bits are in Ukraine territorial waters. Whilst Neptune/StormShadow/etc have snuck past S400 from time to time, it would be a lot easier with ATACMS. Both the matter of the getting past the S400 and then doing the right amount of damage on impact.
Re the hit on the shipyard drydock in this pic you can see an addition missle strike after the fire was well underway. The floating drydock, the target, had a landing ship and a sub undergoing repairs. Makes one wonder if Ukraine is deliberately targeting the landing ships? Or if this was one damaged earlier this year?
The U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the other co-host, said “20 Days in Mariupol” documents “the horrors of (Russian President Vladimir) Putin’s war of aggression.”
“We’re here tonight to bear witness, to bear witness to these horrors and to reaffirm our commitment to justice and peace,” she said. “We must continue to hold Russia to account for its atrocities. We must continue to support the Ukrainian people in their time of need.”
So they hit Crimea, again.
I get the feeling that the Russian air defence system in the Kherson/Crimea area has suffered another significant degradation in recent weeks. It is an example of evolutionary punctuated equilibrium in reverse.My partner read that Crimea currently only has enough fuel for a couple of days. It appears all of Russia is having a fuel shortage, even the military.