Why the extreme unbalance against PerfectLogic?
Some of his posts have pissed me off, for sure, but in the dispute with Julian he has been not significantly more slanderous and bitchy than his adversary. They have treated each other in roughly the same way, but the bear gets beaten down and disliked into oblivion.
I don't know whether he is right in his suspicion that Julian has been dishonest about his calls. However, Julian's unwillingness to engage with this point and debunk the claim, which would be a simple matter of linking to a single post, does give some credence to PL's claim.
Julian, I invite you to post links to the calls in question and prove PerfectLogic wrong. You are an intelligent and respected member and it would be worthy of your stature in this forum to accept my invitation. To remind you, his accusation is that you made wrong calls on Feb 4th and Feb 6th.
Another highly respected member, DaveT, also
levelled serious criticism against Julian's claim of a near-perfect track record of stock calls. This was a direct accusation of cherrypicking, a serious accusation, and yet received no dislikes (I mention this just as a curious point).
DaveT, I invite you to highlight some calls that Julian purposely omitted to make his calls on the stock look better than they were.
Let's have all cards on the table.
To everyone not involved in this cluster**** that's been going on here, I apologise for having added to the clutter. I really think we need to cut through the crap and rhetoric and sort out a simple fact or two. Then maybe this place will become bearable again.
Please everyone, really.