Tesla - Equity Resiliency - SCE

[RKCRLR]

I have seent his 13.2 number passed around but I cannot see why its appropriate unless SGIP requires the kWh rating to be at maximum possible discharge.

I could see a slight difference if it was rated at 5 kW, I am really not sure why this difference pops up from time to time.

@wwhitney had posted it is because of the discharge rate SGIP requires for the capacity measurement.

 

[Vines]

@wwhitney had posted it is because of the discharge rate SGIP requires for the capacity measurement.

Ah, that is as I suspected. Interesting, thanks I missed that post.

 

[mjptech]

When the installer submitted the SGIP application on our behalf back in August last year, they listed the storage capacity of both batteries as 26.4KWh (13.2KWh/battery). So basically SCE's SGIP rebate is $1,000/KWh or $26,400 when the rebate should be $27,000. Yet another feather in the cap of our installer whom I have dubbed 'Petersen Dean V2.0"......View attachment 697713

But isn't that $26400 just a potential max... The max amount you get is based on the actual Powerwall and related costs which should bring it down...

 

[RKCRLR]

But isn't that $26400 just a potential max... The max amount you get is based on the actual Powerwall and related costs which should bring it down...
View attachment 698057


View attachment 698056

Yes, $26,400 is the maximum SGIP incentive for 2 Powerwalls. My installation cost less so I received an incentive that was the the actual cost. However, some complex installations could exceed the incentive amount.