You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I suggest that you should do some research before making ill informed commentsWell, that's probably not the best analogy. Really, we can't look to any other car for a suitable comparison. With a Delorean, you just keep it filled with gas and it continues to go until it wears out. Sure, maybe you can't get parts, but that's not the same thing as suddenly getting in your car and not being able to use it because a software license is no longer able to validate itself with a centralized service. If that's even the case. I suspect it is to some degree.
They are losing money
that is debatable, do you know how tesla acquired it's factory?Tesla is INVESTING money in expensive buildings, and expensive robots, and expensive superchargers. All of those things have VALUE.
the fact is when you fill your ICE up you are burning through your moneyPutting gas in your car, that is losing money.
They are not losing money, they are spending more money on development than they are making. There is a huge difference there.This is the part that worries me, as I'm not sure they are operating within a viable financial construct. They are losing money and are only able to sustain operations by continuously raising additional capital. Many things could happen that might or might not be Tesla specific that could affect their ability to continue raising capital.
In my world a business taking in less money than it is expending is losing money.They are not losing money, they are spending more money on development than they are making. There is a huge difference there.
I think that long before tesla would go belly up one of the "majors" would acquire the company.I think this is a decent question, regardless of the probability of Tesla dissolution.
With an 'installed base' of 200,000 or so by the time such a thing could happen, somebody could make good money supporting them and even enhancing them. It seems to me the most likely outcome would be some group of Tesla people forming a new company to support Tesla vehicles and stationary storage products. The probability of being acquired by another car company prior to dissolution would be far higher IMHO. Frankly the probability of Tesla dissolution is probably far less than is that of Chrysler.
In my world a business taking in less money than it is expending is losing money.
Well that's the question. You know that for sure? For extended times, I mean. My French media player worked for a little bit. My CAD software doesn't work at all. There are variances.You car will work just fine as a car without an internet connection.
Of course it works for short periods. I was never suggesting the car would shut down while driving through a tunnel You're probably right. I'd still think it would be assuring to know for sure.We know that the cars work fine without an internet connection for at least short periods - and there's never been any indication that I've seen/read anywhere of a phone home logic bomb.
I didn't know that. Any links you know of? Assuming they aren't connecting by WIFI when parked (do Tesla's have that?), that would provide assurance of continuation.Several people has completely removed the SIM card from salvage/modified cars with no ill effects.
I suggest you learn to not make trolling comments. What other purpose could that be other than to bait? "Ill informed comments"? I postulated a question that - thus far - has no definitive answer. What "research" were you suggesting? A personal letter to Mr. Musk? Or... what about having a discussion with peers to hammer out a logical conclusion? Oh, wait... that's what this is.I suggest that you should do some research before making ill informed comments
Yes, I agree the odds are low. But then, the odds of a lottery are low and people still play. If this were a $200 phone I wouldn't care, but a $50,000 to $150,000 car? Low odds are still odds.I think this is a decent question, regardless of the probability of Tesla dissolution.
With an 'installed base' of 200,000 or so by the time such a thing could happen, somebody could make good money supporting them and even enhancing them. It seems to me the most likely outcome would be some group of Tesla people forming a new company to support Tesla vehicles and stationary storage products. The probability of being acquired by another car company prior to dissolution would be far higher IMHO. Frankly the probability of Tesla dissolution is probably far less than is that of Chrysler.
trolling question? try reading for comprehension!I suggest you learn to not make trolling comments. What other purpose could that be other than to bait? "Ill informed comments"? I postulated a question that - thus far - has no definitive answer.
that is debatable, do you know how tesla acquired it's factory?
the value of a commodity or a service is only what someone else will pay for it. in the case of the GM/Toyota plant the facility was not a productive one, both owners wanted out and no company other than tesla showed any interest in acquiring the facility, it traded at fair value.Someone undervalued it. Doesn't stop it from being worth money.
Try writing for civility!trolling question? try reading for comprehension!
I offered a scenario of a small volume luxury auto manufacturer that went bankrupt and how owners of that failed company's cars fared with the cars after the company closed shop as an indicator of how the world could be for tesla owners if tesla closed up shop tomorrow. I pointed you in direction delorean's story. now if you weren't so hot to trot to get into a flame battle you would have done some research. if you did you'd see that the bankruptcy of a car company is not a fatal event for the owners of the failed company's product.
all I can say is wowYour world is not the financial world then If you buy an apple from the store, did you "lose" it? Neither the money nor the apple are lost. You know exactly where it went
In my world a business taking in less money than it is expending is losing money.
I think most people invest in things with the expectation of making a profit. if an investment fails to generate a profit it becomes a failed investment.
there is a vast difference in buying something for consumption and buying something as an investment.Must make it tough to buy anything.
Thank you kindly.