For being the latest news and published today, it's a bit old.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For being the latest news and published today, it's a bit old.
While Tesla Roadster concept car is not yet widely available, with a retail price of $109,000, it is hardly surprising. A top speed of 125 miles and a driving range of 244 miles achieving 0-60 in 3.9 seconds, the Roadster does offer a real sporting pedigree and offers a glimmer of hope that electric cars could get over their major hangover of their limited driving range. Their other issue of their price tag may make it harder to secure investment.
AUTOMOBILES. K&L Gates is lobbying for Tesla Motors, an electric car maker. The company is seeking a loan from the Energy Department. Scott Aliferis, a former legislative director to Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), is one of four lobbyists working on behalf of Tesla.
Feinstein’s letter also noted that her own state is home to one such start-up company competing for a chunk of the $25 billion in EISA money: Tesla Motors of San Carlos, which has applied for $400 million. Feinstein also takes issue with an amendment Levin has pushed to restrict the loans to manufacturers that have existed for at least 20 years, arguing to Reid that Levin’s amendment would rule out any help for foreign and new companies.
“This is unacceptable to me,” Feinstein wrote.
A Feinstein spokesman said the California senator is still considering her position on this week’s bill and is merely promoting the idea of fuel-efficient technology, regardless of where it is developed or manufactured.
“The point is simple: American automakers — whether based in Michigan or California — should pursue fuel-efficient, next-generation technologies like hybrid and electric,” the spokesman said.
Diarmuid O’Connell, Tesla’s vice president for business development, says his Silicon Valley-area company needs the $400 million to manufacture electric batteries as well as a sedan. He takes pains to avoid any criticism of Detroit, but does echo Feinstein’s case that Tesla’s cars represent the next generation.
“We’ve never regarded this as an ‘us versus them’ situation, like ‘us against Detroit,’ ” O’Connell said. “We do think these [EISA] funds were set aside to inspire and incentivize the future.”
...Levin has pushed to restrict the loans to manufacturers that have existed for at least 20 years...
This sounds like a rather direct attempt to cut Tesla out.
Forces at work trying to stop them in their tracks?
vfx said:what the #%\@*!!
Save our loan: That could be Tesla Motors' response to Detroit's Big Three looking to snag $15 billion from a federal pot designed for the San Carlos electric car company and other clean-tech outfits like it. "Its something of a travesty that a fund for alternative energy goes to bail out gas guzzlers," said Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Still, in light of the awful jobs report last week, he said, "I probably would have done something similar," referring to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who supported a bailout deal she had initially sworn to oppose. "It's regrettable, but if they stay true to their word, to replenish the fund quickly, it should be all right."
For Tesla, "all right" hinges on getting a $400 million loan from the government's Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Incentive Program Tesla applied to last month. The money, administered by the Department of Energy, will help fund Tesla's $60,000 "Model S" sedan.
The prototype of the car will be unveiled in February, with cars on the road expected by 2011, assuming circumstances remain all right. Last week, Musk told me, Tesla closed on $40 million in new private investment. Today, Tesla unmasks its 100th paying customer, name withheld at press time. No, we are assured, it's not another Hollywood celebrity like Leonardo DiCaprio, George Clooney or Matt Damon, all proud owners of the $109,000 Tesla Roadster.
And, no, it's not San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. His was delivered Thanksgiving weekend.
Point of order: Contrary to a New York Times column, which I cited last week, Tesla insists that none of the $400 million, taxpayer-funded loan it's seeking will be going toward any operating expenses connected to its premium-priced sports car or existing power train supply business. It will go, instead, toward its more affordable sedan.
While other people might have drooled over actor Daniel Craig in the latest Bond flick, Quantum of Solace, I couldn't tear my eyes away from the Aston Martin DBS he drove during the opening scene car chase. At one point I turned to my husband and whispered, "I WANT THAT CAR!"
At some point more of the Tesla roadsters will hit the road, but if the manufacturer sticks to the $110,000 per car pricing plan, I won't be driving it. And some of the other options coming to the market — the Venturi Fetish, Lightning GT and the Fisker Karma — are also priced for people who likely have more disposable cash than the average two-income family. Sigh.
“We can’t move forward with that without a major amount of capital,” Musk told Bloomies. “If we don’t get any government funding then what we need to do is we need to wait until the capital markets recover, which could be a year or two years from now.” Or, in Tesla’s case, never. Hang on; $350m? Wasn’t that $400m the last time we looked?
“In addition to the $350 million loan application for the new sedan, Musk said Tesla is seeking $100 million to expand its drive train business in which it sells parts to other automakers and $200 million for a battery-cell production factory.”
So I make that $650m in taxpayer funds for a Silicon Valley start-up that’s sold– by its own count– 100 cars. Where do I sign?
I don't like the TTAC language but Tesla are playing a very high stakes game with their current line.
Maybe it's time for Tesla to tone it down and not try to talk so much about this with the media. After all it's a DOE loan and really not up to the public to decide. Right now pretty much the public perception of any loan to an automaker is very negative and it seems, as expected, Tesla is getting a lot more negative response than a positive one from the public (judging from the internet crowd).
I think that was Tesla's original plan (being low-key about it all). I think the latest media blitz is in reaction to the NYT, WSJ, Newsweek articles.
Now some powerful Washington politicians want those soccer moms' tax dollars to subsidize the gentry's cars. This should receive as much congressional scrutiny as any of the errors committed by the Detroit Three's chief executives.