MC3OZ
Active Member
Recycling fits the description of boring and repetitive.I think in Musk's view the point of solving the sustainable energy problem is so that the future has a higher probability of being good. Originally, Tesla's mission was to accelerate sustainable TRANSPORT, but this was later broadened to sustainable ENERGY, which of course is inclusive of transportation. So there is precedent for Tesla clarifying an broading its mission. Perhaps, we should start talking about SUSTAINABLE LIVING.
Along the path to sustainability AI and robotics are important transformative and enabling technologies. Both are critical to making sure that use of energy and other natural resource are as efficient and necessary as possible. For example, years ago one might have thought that video conferencing was not withing scope of a mission for sustainable energy. However, it is now becoming clear that video conferencing enable the economy to pivot away from air travel, daily commuting, and even the need for so much commercial and public building. These are profound changes that impact our ability to decarbonize the economy because they reduce demand for physical resources needed to advance the economy. Fewer airplanes, fewer cars, fewer office buildings, enabled by video conferencing and many other technologies, are terrific stepping stones along the path to sustainability. Right now, we might collectively lack the imagination to see how a Tesla Bot could transform the global economy to need fewer natural resources, but thirty years from now looking back, it will likely be obvious how humanoid robots opened up critical alternatives to burning more fossil fuels and made life on Earth a little more sustainable.
The bot is a long term project.
- Was the event mainly about recruitment? - Yes
- Is recruitment needed? - Definitely according to the staff.
- Was the recruiting event a success? - Going by the questions at tne end - Yes
- Did all of the technology presented seem like the right path? - Yes
- Can Tesla afford to fund the R&D expansion? - Yes
While FSD is important, scaling to 20 million vechicles per year and 3 TWh of in house cell production is more important. That is how Tesla can afford to fund projects like the bot, there is a steady march of increasing revenue.
When we look at the big picture, there is no rush with the bot, itnis fine if development takes a few years. But when the have the bot there is are a lot of useful potential applications.
We have seen Tesla can do multiple projects at the same time and the priority projects are rarely impacted.