There was nothing snarky about what I wrote, just a simple fact correction to a long post of OT speculation about the pintle injectors in Raptor - pintle injectors are for liquids, but Raptor is full staged flow and thus what's being burned are gases. Why are you reacting so angrily? Would you rather I have not corrected this and just watched you continue an argument akin to people speculating about what type of spark plugs you'd use in an electric car?
You hate me, I get it - no need to rub it in.
LIFO / tl;dr:
No Hate:
I have no hate for anyone on this board present company included. I've liked some of your posts, found other informative, and disagreed with some.
No argument:
There was no argument going on. @Fact Checking described the Merlin engine injectors in a misleading or incorrect way, I provided data supporting that there is one in the center. He responded that ITAR was their main point. I immediate liked their post and apologized for the off main-topicness in a PM.
Look at what you wrote:
"Would you rather I have not corrected this and just watched you continue an argument akin to people speculating about what type of spark plugs you'd use in an electric car?"
The was nothing in my post to correct.I did not say Raptor had pintle injectors, @Fact Checking did not say Raptor has pintle injectors. What was said was there are no images of Merlin engine's injectors, groupings, and shape. Those characteristics are misleading since a face pintle injector is.a single port.
Would you have preferred FC's post to go uncorrected that indicated Merlin has multiple injectors? They said "shape, grouping, and placement", I provided source data of one central injector. IMHO, an augment requires at least on response for the original party.
Making an analogy to electric cars having spark plugs has no purpose but to create a sense of ridiculousness regarding my post or justification in response, and is not helpful to communication.
Long OT reference:
That was one post as a response to one post, three posts total (because we took it off-line). And while it was OT, it was not speculation and it was not about Raptor, it was about Merlin. The only person directly talking about Raptor is you, the post has a picture of a Raptor, but the topic started by FC was rocket engine, specifically Merlin, images. The word Raptor is never even used. As to length, it was not as long as recent spreadsheet posts or cat images.
As to OT, there are multiple sports posts to address.
Snark Factor:
"Why exactly are we discussing pintle injectors when Raptor is full flow staged combustion, i.e. the propellants enter the combustion chamber as gases? Pintle injectors are designed to atomize liquids."
It may be a language thing, but where I'm from the use of "Why exactly are we" is snark. It implies there is no reason to be discussing or doing whatever the rest of the statement is describing. There is no 'we' and there is no need to defend ones self with an 'exact' reason.
There was no argument going on. @Fact Checking described the Merlin engine injectors in a misleading or incorrect way, I provided data supporting that there is one in the center. He responded that ITAR was their main point. I immediate liked their post and apologized for the off main-topicness in a PM.
Look at what you wrote:
"Would you rather I have not corrected this and just watched you continue an argument akin to people speculating about what type of spark plugs you'd use in an electric car?"
The was nothing in my post to correct.I did not say Raptor had pintle injectors, @Fact Checking did not say Raptor has pintle injectors. What was said was there are no images of Merlin engine's injectors, groupings, and shape. Those characteristics are misleading since a face pintle injector is.a single port.
Would you have preferred FC's post to go uncorrected that indicated Merlin has multiple injectors? They said "shape, grouping, and placement", I provided source data of one central injector. IMHO, an augment requires at least on response for the original party.
Making an analogy to electric cars having spark plugs has no purpose but to create a sense of ridiculousness regarding my post or justification in response, and is not helpful to communication.
Long OT reference:
That was one post as a response to one post, three posts total (because we took it off-line). And while it was OT, it was not speculation and it was not about Raptor, it was about Merlin. The only person directly talking about Raptor is you, the post has a picture of a Raptor, but the topic started by FC was rocket engine, specifically Merlin, images. The word Raptor is never even used. As to length, it was not as long as recent spreadsheet posts or cat images.
As to OT, there are multiple sports posts to address.
Snark Factor:
"Why exactly are we discussing pintle injectors when Raptor is full flow staged combustion, i.e. the propellants enter the combustion chamber as gases? Pintle injectors are designed to atomize liquids."
It may be a language thing, but where I'm from the use of "Why exactly are we" is snark. It implies there is no reason to be discussing or doing whatever the rest of the statement is describing. There is no 'we' and there is no need to defend ones self with an 'exact' reason.