Johann Koeber
Happy Owner
Can I just mention that it bugs me that you have badging and a spoiler, and I (4.5 months after delivery) do not? Not your fault, I know...
But YOU have the car, I only got to look at it.
Do you want to trade?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can I just mention that it bugs me that you have badging and a spoiler, and I (4.5 months after delivery) do not? Not your fault, I know...
My take is that there is not going to be a SR, but rather that Tesla will bring the MR in that price range by incremental improvements. But, with sustained demand and weak competition, they are not in a hurry to do so (hence the shifting timeline).
I agree with this, if the MR became the SR, then that blows the competition (is there any) totally into the weeds.
Yes. Have you ever heard me talk about it before?
That doesn't mean that if specifically challenged on the issue in a discussion specifically on the topic I'm not going to respond.
But I've been trying to avoid talking about this topic again and generally been ignoring replies on the topic, for the sake of this forum, so let's please not bring it back up.
That is in opposition to Carsonight’s reports that the SR pack line is being installed at GF1, the size of a football field.
Selling the 35k$ right now would likely lead to 3k$ to 5k$ operating losses per unit. In pretty much no scenario does it lead to substantial profits while putting a substantially inferior version of the car on the road compared to an MR and PUP and EAP model which only costs about 3k$ more to build. Far better imo to stick with 40k$+ configs and keep volume high by lowering prices for all configurations. If you put aside the 35k$ promise, this is essentially what they have been doing. And it also fits with their prioritization on minimizing total configurations built.
All they have to do is weasel out of the 35k$ entry by pointing at tax break and/or offering a deal to those that were on reservation list only.
Under no scenario do they sell a 35k$ option with even more than what was originally claimed for it. It simply costs too much.
I think they absolutely have to come with a $35k model before any incentives are applied. If they don't do this then all trust is lost going forwards.
Yes all the more reason for packing up, they were only here to avoid Euro levy, I understand that there were approx 350 truckloads of parts coming in from Europe every day( sounds horrendous) and so makes you wonder how it was ever practical/ economical. I see that the Turkish plant is also more than likely going, another Eu fudge (sorry it has to be said) of being in the customs union but not in the EU .It's the obvious thing to do. I simply don't remember a more definite confirmation for that other than Jack.
~90% of the production at that plant goes for export btw.
They can potentially pull it off if they make all such cars come from China, but otherwise you are talking about a situation where for the 35k$ to 38k$ price range Tesla is selling 100k units a year and losing a couple hundred million doing so while building something far more utilitarian than usual Tesla brand standards. If they get reservation holders a satisfactory deal I think it is fine.
Tesla 10-k out today on their IR website. I didn't see anything noteworthy at a quick glance, other than confirmation of eventually still aiming to introduce the $35,000 Model 3. I expect the media will be full of out-of-context quotes from the risks section though - that usually happens!
Saw on Twitter fud: data leaked from Tesla's website (inventory match flag), the current inventory is about 8500 cars still waiting on parking lots.
That's about (or less than) 2 weeks of production. Not that bad isn't it?
But it also shows how inventory growed end of December, so sales definitely took a hit (but one could also assume that those cars were put on botes)