It is a bit complex issue:
1. Elon at that point could not confirm the capital raise. So the question was dumb.
2. Elon does not like analysts with low target price and "underperform" recommendations especially if he considers the analysis dumb. Elon was a bit aggressive there.
3. Given the fairly convincing rumors of starting a breakthrough battery cell production, it was predictable that in some form they will need funds to finance expansion even with FCA generously volunteering to finance Giga Berlin. So the claim that TSLA does not need money was an obvious BS.
And I completely agree.
My post was not referring to any of that, however. It was about the fact that
1. when, during the heat of the moment -- conference call -- one poster claims that Elon just basically called a question "dumb" in an indirect way, a prominent forum contributor hits the Love button
2. when a different poster makes the same claim to indicate the contradiction between Elon's comments during the CC and today's announcement, that same prominent forum contributor calls that poster "self-loathing"
Elon (and implicitly Tesla) changes course when presented with changing circumstances. That's a good thing for sure. We here may also change our perspective of the company's evolution and decisions as a result. But it's disingenuous for someone to then claim they never felt differently (which is basically just an expression of unwavering trust in Elon's decision-making), and it's even worse to attack another forum member who points out the strong contradiction between Elon's stances at two different points in time. Disagreeing is fine, but I personally draw a line at personal attacks.