jhm
Well-Known Member
I do like that the range extender need not complicate the manufacture of the CT. They don't even need to be made in the same factory or delivered with the vehicle. Fewer factory options is better for high volume production.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When I first found out about the "range extender", I figured that the sub-trunk space you are talking about is where it would be installed. Then we found out it takes up 1/3 of the bed space in the back of the bed.
There must be something about that storage location that makes adding batteries problematic. My guess is that it has something to do with adding a lot of extra weight to that part of the vehicle. Adding batteries to the back of the bed probably doesn't mess with the center of gravity much. Maybe that's the reason?
The closer the weight is to the centre of the vehicle, the better. The storage is way aft of the centre.
Option: Start deliveries primarily near Fremont and Austin for quick engineering support and minimal shipping costs. Slowly expand to well serviced areas. Then country wide.Honestly, that 2024 delivery seems odd as to how it could be interpreted. I know that reservation holders will be taking delivery throughout 2024, and probably 2025 and 2026 as well.
Do the math based upon 1,000,000 reservations, conservatively, as reservation estimates are double that.
Even if 50% cancelled it leaves 500K taking delivery (and this is still very, very conservative).
If they somehow hit 100-150K production in 2024, (very optimistic and highly unlikely), and 250K production by the end of 2025,that would still not deliver enough to begin filling new orders made since deliveries began yesterday.
2027 could be an optimistic delivery date for anyone placing an order today.
As @madodel indicated, the production line is fully installed and appeared to be operational. It stretches from column 47 to column 84, that is, from behind the main entrance to the South wall of the existing building. It is close to a 1/4 mile long, with robots whirring about to our amusement, and parallel support lines for staging parts and pre-assembly of various components.
It is only a matter of whatever amount of time it takes to ramp up while working out the bugs to fine-tune the line toward rated capacity.
Fixed it ya, thanks. I only have PW 2 version. Hopefully it all integrates the same.Cybertruck's ouput (48A, 11.5kW) is equal to one Powerwall 3.
Plus extender as factory installed option pushes MSRP of dual over the $80k IRA limit...I do like that the range extender need not complicate the manufacture of the CT. They don't even need to be made in the same factory or delivered with the vehicle. Fewer factory options is better for high volume production.
Personally-I doubt that. It's a huge cost adder to a trailer that may only be towed a few times a year. You also have the issue of driving dynamics when the trailer is pushing you with it's own motor to contend with. But who knows-maybe battery tech will evolve to the point that this isn't cost prohibitive fairly shortly.
Where can I plug in all my M12 or EGO batteries?As long as we’re dreaming, how about a rack in the front of the bed that could take smaller, more easily handled battery modules. Plug-and-play with maybe each module supporting 15-20 miles of range. Just take as much extra battery as you might need for any given trip.
Agreed, but the vertical distance in the bed (from the current centre of gravity) is much smaller than the horizontal distance from the centre of the vehicle if the pack was in the under-the-bed compartment. (I'm thinking about ice days).However, lower is also gooder... and that under-the-bed compartment is lower.
oh yeah! This is one of the material companies I've invested in.Some good news not related to the CT. US processing plant for nickel ore will get $115 million in federal funds to get it up and running is finalized.
Tesla-linked North Dakota nickel ore processing plant reaches deal over federal money
Well, sure, that is logical and a good strategy from a manufacturer's point of view.Option: Start deliveries primarily near Fremont and Austin for quick engineering support and minimal shipping costs. Slowly expand to well serviced areas. Then country wide.
Some good news not related to the CT. US processing plant for nickel ore will get $115 million in federal funds to get it up and running is finalized.
Tesla-linked North Dakota nickel ore processing plant reaches deal over federal money
One of the reasons I latched onto this company a few years ago was reading this on their site (I've highlighted in yellow). I thought this was great to see and another notch taken off the excuse thread of "but mining for EV materials"...Some good news not related to the CT. US processing plant for nickel ore will get $115 million in federal funds to get it up and running is finalized.
Tesla-linked North Dakota nickel ore processing plant reaches deal over federal money
Marques half-heartedly mentioned that the back window does not go down. This will be a real negative. A BIG negative if you planned to camp IN it. And a large percentage did.Someone posted this graphic from MKBHD review. Interesting MKBHD says that Road noise is higher than other Teslas, whereas Musk said it will be most quietest Tesla due to the armored glass. I trust MKBHD.
View attachment 995472