Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

TSLA Market Action: 2018 Investor Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Model S/X packs are assembled at Fremont, and are never processed through GF1.

To workaround tariffs for S/X, a model that is similar to Tillsburg (Europe) , could be set up ...
Right now it is S/X sales that are suffering from the 55% tariffs

Edit(Add)..For Model 3, might as well start simplified production line (the one under tent) .. that took 2-3 months to setup. For this as well, until stamping press etc are all in place, send the parts over from Fremont & Sparks

(production line with Kuka robots might we easier to set up ) .. than the rest of the parts ... ~ cheers
 
Actually, this happens already: when a Model S/X is sold in China, the cell was made in Japan, shipped to Nevada, assembled into a battery pack, mated in Fremont and the shipped back over the Pacific to China.

Shipping 2170 cells would be pretty cost efficient, as they are dense and can be packed tightly.

Also, the primary short term goal would be to avoid the 40% tariffs, shipping a full car costs maybe $1,500, cell shipments would be significantly cheaper.

Once the Shanghai cell lines are up and running they could substitute.

Edit: correction by @Artful Dodger.

There is a good chance the 40% tariff will be removed by next year.
 
This shouldn't affect the point I tried to make: 18,650 cells are already shipped over the Pacific twice. Shipping 2170 cells once should not be a big cost - until GF3 cell production ramps up.
Tesla would likely also consider having Samsung manufacture some 2170 automotive cells in Korea for assembly at GF3, if that's allowable under China's import regime. Tesla owns the IP, and could easily have a 3rd party make the cells.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mongo
Tesla would likely also consider having Samsung manufacture some 2170 automotive cells in Korea for assembly at GF3, if that's allowable under China's import regime. Tesla owns the IP, and could easily have a 3rd party make the cells.

Panasonic has been a good and reliable partner so far, so I'd guess they are the top candidates - unless they are being unreasonable about the GF3 investment (which I don't think they are).

It's still a negotiation process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Artful Dodger
Direct issue from Tesla (new shares) using predetermined pricing (close on date y or some such) no impact on market (beyond minor dilution)

Btw., won't this kill the short thesis that claims that Tesla is under a "Wells notice" that makes them unable to raise cash? A small ~70,000 shares demonstration that this is not so. ;)

The real reason Tesla is not raising cash through equity financing is because they are cash flow positive and are paying back debt from internally generated cash.
 
To workaround tariffs for S/X, a model that is similar to Tillsburg (Europe) , could be set up ...
Right now it is S/X sales that are suffering from the 55% tariffs

Edit(Add)..For Model 3, might as well start simplified production line (the one under tent) .. that took 2-3 months to setup. For this as well, until stamping press etc are all in place, send the parts over from Fremont & Sparks

(production line with Kuka robots might we easier to set up ) .. than the rest of the parts ... ~ cheers

Thinking out loud ... just based on intent of setting up factory and starting construction, could the China Govt remove some of the tariffs for S/X as part of the process etc etc (say something like a EV tax credit..)?
 
Q3 is all about positive cash flow. I hope there's a profit, but most of all I hope we show the world that Tesla has generated more than $500 million in positive cash flow. $700 million would be even better. This is a huge part of the answer to the bears that keep chiming "How are they going to pay the debt?" What will be important is for Elon and Deepak to lay out the how and why of Q4 and 2019's early quarters and explain expected average sale prices, estimated quantities of vehicles that will be produced and delivered, and how the M3 gross margins will grow to 25%. How well those two get the message across in the ER and conference call will greatly affect how long the media stays negative and how the shorts will behave in the coming months.

Shorts are planning to dismiss Q3 as a one-time wonder, or perhaps as a two-time wonder along with Q4. Elon and Deepak have to take this argument head on at the Q3 ER and CC.

Ok, so we can expect negativity and shorts to continue with fervor after earnings call since there’s no chance of them going into any such depth of explanation and plan forward. Probably because nobody will ask those questions.

I’m betting focus of call is on his stepping down as chair, who replacement will be, what is current demand/reservation number, timeline for SR 3/European deliveries to start, GF China and everything else but what you just posted.

BTW, another 65,000+/- shares now off the table and in Elon’s pocket. That’s I believe his third buy in the last year. Yep, nothing to see here.

Edit: sorry new shares for Elon but still off the table.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't make much of anything of the 20$ million in stock purchased by Musk. It's pretty clearly that the company wants him to pay both halves of the SEC settlement and they don't want it to impact their cash on hand at all (which actually COULD be a little scary)

For Musk $20M is pretty small change (although, he's apparently not very liquid so it's something)
Be more excited by the over 35M in stock that he has purchased over the past several months WITHOUT making newsy announcements
I'm actually just a TAD concerned that they wanted to make this a newsy announcement, sort of trying to inform investors about interest/intent but at the same time it seems like the opposite could be more the case.
they really need to get the share price up in order to meet some debt covenants for possible conversion, but I don't see that likely at all - that they will hit those targets.
 
When is Tesla offering their own insurance, they Are much safer cars. I gues this would scale along with their body shops?

Insurance is heavily regulated state by state, and significant financial reserves are required. It would be a foolish diversion from Tesla's main lines of business.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.