CuriousSunbird
Member
I'm not a long and they haven't kicked me out yet.Is this forum for longs only and not traders? If so, I’ll just see my way out.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not a long and they haven't kicked me out yet.Is this forum for longs only and not traders? If so, I’ll just see my way out.
Now, all we need is a catalyst. I wonder what that will be?
My guess: older, less stupid shorts.Shorts have been selling like crazy lately, 41M shares shorted. Question is, Who has been buying?
My quess: younger, more stupid shorts.When shorts want to cover who will be willing to sell to them?
That's the thing with a squeeze ... you cannot foretell the exact reason nor moment. Everyone, short and long, is more or less caught with pants at their knees ...Market veterans will be stunned by it’s scale and ferocity.
Now, all we need is a catalyst. I wonder what that will be?
and here is the bear... It can be taken at face value or spun in some interesting ways.
Not sure it will have much impact as their PT was already $470 and BUY, but they get it, one of the few...
After re-reading your previous post I believe what you're trying to say is – correct me if I'm wrong –, that those numbers in the spec sheet and real world results don't match up because they were putting dummy weights in place of the "missing" front motor while benchmarking M3 LR RWD. Correct?
If so, I doubt it. I'm pretty sure they do separate performance benchmarks for every drive unit config and they do not use any sort of inter- or extrapolation to calculate those specs.
I think the reason why we're seeing a delta between the spec sheet and real world performance is, that Tesla purposely underspecs the M3 on paper to artificially widen the performance gap between the 3 and the S. This is important in order to keep the halo status of the S intact.
For comparison, BMW just isn’t as fast Model Model 3. M6, M7 can’t even compete:
BMW M6 Reviews | BMW M6 Price, Photos, and Specs | Car and Driver
Wild guess from Mongo's planet: Brin, Page, Gates, Bezos, Cook, SpaceX. That's enough forward looking billionaires to soak up 29% of theQuestion is, Who has been buying?
So I'm curious about where did you get that '' fact'' ? : ''The reason i think it's bad news is that we now know for a fact that Tesla thinks the conversion rate COULD be bad.''
All this talk about the shortened delivery times potentially being bad news, low take-up, cancellations, is total nonsense.
It is simply that the majority of M3 reservation holders want the cheaper car - after all, the M3's biggest marketing point is that it's a Tesla for $35k, and that's what most signed-up for, and these orders will be fulfilled when the scale and margins are available.
I only see positives here.
The Electrek article stated that new reservations for the base vehicle might get their car as soon as 6 months. Doesn’t this indicate Tesla may go through their entire U.S. reservation list by then?
Assume U.S. at 225k reservations
Assume 5k/week starting today and 30k delivered so far = 150k delivered by 6 months from now.
That would be a take rate of 67%.
More than 5k, or a smaller percentage of reservations being U.S, or SR deliveries for new reservations starting later than 6 months from now would improve that take rate.
Would 67% be positive?
Is this analysis correct?
Personally, I think it is shooting in the dark to try to speculate on meaning anymore. I would take it at face value. It seems Tesla is going to be able to meet demand sooner than originally expected.The Electrek article stated that new reservations for the base vehicle might get their car as soon as 6 months. Doesn’t this indicate Tesla may go through their entire U.S. reservation list by then?
Assume U.S. at 225k reservations
Assume 5k/week starting today and 30k delivered so far = 150k delivered by 6 months from now.
That would be a take rate of 67%.
More than 5k, or a smaller percentage of reservations being U.S, or SR deliveries for new reservations starting later than 6 months from now would improve that take rate.
Would 67% be positive?
Is this analysis correct?
My opinion is no. They’re not gonna produce tons of SR 3’s when they have reservations for Performance 3’s on the books. Perhaps a smattering here and there just to keep the media at bay, but IMHO Performance reservations will soon jump to the front of the line.
If Electrek is correct, they would fulfill all current reservations including all SRs within 6 months. How else could a brand new SR reservation be fulfilled in 6 months?
TLA FTW! BRBBTW the non-AWD version is RWD, not FWD.