#Tesla registered 1,774 new #Model3 VINs. ~72% estimated to be dual motor. Highest VIN is 183559.
Model 3 VINs on Twitter
Model 3 VINs on Twitter
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
Jo-
Member
"There is a creeping tendency to use made up acronyms at SpaceX. Excessive use of made up acronyms is a significant impediment to communication and keeping communication good as we grow is incredibly important.
Individually, a few acronyms here and there may not seem so bad, but if a thousand people are making these up, over time the result will be a huge glossary that we have to issue to new employees. No one can actually remember all these acronyms and people don’t want to seem dumb in a meeting, so they just sit there in ignorance. This is particularly tough on new employees."
Buckminster
Well-Known Member
Climate change could cost US 'hundreds of billions' a year: study
I don't believe that global warming will be linear. I think that somewhere is the point of no return. But where? I hope that I'm wrong!
I don't believe that global warming will be linear. I think that somewhere is the point of no return. But where? I hope that I'm wrong!
Words of HABIT
Active Member
Karen, It is great that you are able to time TSLA. Well done.Um... I did. Wish there was an easier way to search through this forum for all posts from a specific individual, because I made several public posts on this. I can in short order find a PM conversation with Bobo (who can confirm this), where I responded, when he asked me of my price targets:
To be more specific: Apart from reducing some overexposure shortly after the Q3 report (I really exposed myself on those ~$250 prices, they were just too tempting!), I set sell points at ~$346, ~$354, and ~$362. (the ~$346 had already gone off before Bobo's message). After noticing how Tesla seemed to be functioning as a hedge against the macros, I boosted my buy targets from mid-$320s to around $330.
How did I arrive at this? Simple. Once the Q3 report had been priced in, there's been relatively little news expected in the pipeline that would alter the fundamentals. Just random positive and negative news. So once you feel you have a handle on the average that prices are going to be fluctuating around, and a handle on how intense the volatility will be around that average, you should buy the lows and sell the highs. You then look at how much time is left before you expect any news that will have a long-term impact on the moving average to get a sense of the likelihood of hitting particular highs or lows.
Note in my sig: "Hooray for volatility!"
Full disclaimer: Past performance is no guarantee of future results.Also, I expect a lot more "timing-unpredictable" news in Q1.
For every Karen, there will be 10X that amount of Retail swing traders that will lose money on TSLA (or not generate as much profit as buy-and-hold strategy), as it travels to Mars.
Stocks don't move on magic; they move on news. What news exactly were you expecting during this timeperiod that was going to send the stock to Mars?
Yes, there can be a time delay between when news occurs and sentiment sets in. There certainly was one with the Q3 report. But how long exactly were you thinking it would take for people to come to grips with the implication of the report?
My thesis from the beginning has been that one profitable quarter would help, but it would take two or more to really kick the TSLAQ hypothesis to the curb, as doubters would just insist that the first profitable quarter was just a one-time engineered stunt. Don't you think that this thesis has been upheld thusfar?
To reiterate: past performance does not indicate future returns. Don't take my theses and performance as gospel; do your own research and come to your own conclusions.
Short sellers are struggling. Their massive bet against Elon Musk isn’t helping.
Look at that cover image!
For all the twitter bravado .. this guy is shitting in his pants ...
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
Hence working from his bathroom.
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
Yeah, I saw that the other day. I mean, who does that? Serious kudos to him.
I think it's advertisement for Tesla. They have the best EVs, and the comparison shows it.
Buckminster
Well-Known Member
AlphaGo Zero beats AlphaGo in 40 days. Does this Zero version sound more like the Tesla Neural Network? - in which case this is great news.
Here's how the latest gravitational wave announcement is going to revolutionize physics
Here's how the latest gravitational wave announcement is going to revolutionize physics
Can’t you just use the search function above and type in the username of the user whoose posts your trying to find?
I do it all the time
Buckminster
Well-Known Member
You said that out loud....to everyone...
Err apologies to all - I didn't mean to say those things about you / country / level of TSLA bullishness...
It's Brexit you see. Not getting much sleep - Ambien and S'mores really don't mix. Elon's fault really...
This. Bring in people who dismiss EV’s because they don’t like Tesla by getting them to look at a list of other ones. Through that, they find that: “oh, wow, Tesla’s actually beat the snot out of everything else” and convince themselves to buy one.
Off Shore
Off Topic Member
A master marketeer.
I believe investors reading this forum represent a significant percentage of all tsla investors in terms of total value of investment. I created this survey hoping to get a rough idea about the size of our investment collectively - I think information like this will be beneficial in making this forum a better place for tsla investors. The survey is completely anonymous.
Survey link: TMC tsla investor survey
I will share the result link shortly.
Edit: result link: TMC tsla investor survey
Survey link: TMC tsla investor survey
I will share the result link shortly.
Edit: result link: TMC tsla investor survey
Last edited:
SW2Fiddler
We Are Cognitive Dissidents
He has to. The competition anti-sells their own EVs and he wants more EVs on the road, period.
Drumheller
Active Member
Your age range question has overlap at the round numbers. More accurate to have 10-19, 20-29, 30-39, etc.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Poll
