More anti-wind FUD from the right-wing press: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/mos...er-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html
Not surprisingly the comments on this one were closed, so I used their feedback form:
To give some background, the Mail is claiming that wind turbines *require* neodymium for their generators just as some have claimed that EVs require neodymium for their motors. Both being subject to the same Chinese quotas and the same scare stories about rampant, unregulated polution in its extraction in China. They claim that a 3MW model (a common size) requires 2 tonnes of the stuff.
However it occured to me that induction generators are likely to be just as relevant to this application as induction motors are in the best EVs. Lo and behold a quick search turns up that they are used. In fact the same kind of squirrel cage arrangement as the Roadster is used:
http://www.windturbines.net/wiki/Asynchronous_Generators
So I did a search of the data sheets of the usual suspects in wind turbine manufacturing and found the following:
The first two make the biggest turbines on the market, so neodymium clearly isn't needed to scale up.
Not surprisingly the comments on this one were closed, so I used their feedback form:
In your story of 31st Jan, "In China, the true cost of Britain's clean, green wind power experiment: Pollution on a disastrous scale" you implied that rare earth metals - specifically Neodymium - are necessary for the manufacture of the wind turbines which will allow a significant shift away from the burning of fossil fuels for Britain's energy needs (e.g. caption "the Baotou Xijun Rare Earth refinery in Baotou, where neodymium, essential in new wind turbine magnets, is processed").
In fact many of the most powerful turbine designs do not use rare earth permanent magnets at all - those from Siemens and Enercon, for example, use asynchronous induction generators. These are not affected by Chinese quotas and are not responsible for any of the pollution that you highlight.
Permanent magnets are not a pre-requisite for high power wind turbines and those manufacturers that do use them will undoubtedly redesign their machines as materials scarcity and market forces dictate.
Meanwhile your story comes across as pure scaremongering against what must be seen as an important technology in our battle to achieve energy independence. I can't see why achieving that is not a desirable goal (I have no connection to the wind industry at all).
To give some background, the Mail is claiming that wind turbines *require* neodymium for their generators just as some have claimed that EVs require neodymium for their motors. Both being subject to the same Chinese quotas and the same scare stories about rampant, unregulated polution in its extraction in China. They claim that a 3MW model (a common size) requires 2 tonnes of the stuff.
However it occured to me that induction generators are likely to be just as relevant to this application as induction motors are in the best EVs. Lo and behold a quick search turns up that they are used. In fact the same kind of squirrel cage arrangement as the Roadster is used:
http://www.windturbines.net/wiki/Asynchronous_Generators
So I did a search of the data sheets of the usual suspects in wind turbine manufacturing and found the following:
- Siemens - No permanent magnets (asynchronous induction generator)
- Enercon - No permanent magnets ("Annular generator")
- GE - permanent magnets
- Vestas - permanent magnets
- Alstom - permanent magnets
The first two make the biggest turbines on the market, so neodymium clearly isn't needed to scale up.