Search results

My car has the G pack with slightly lower capacity than yours. According to the newer raven packs (G and supposedly also H) don't run fans high like the earlier models. But the general consensus seems to be that the Raven cars should be able to keep 140kW to around 50%, then throttle somewhat...

Still seeing the same major drop to 250A (~92kW) after less than 30% charged. It is quite unsatisfactory, especially since I'm not sure that this isn't damaging to the car. Seems like some sort of safe-mode, and there is no external indication that the car is doing anything to remedy it, other...

Thanks for the info. That still seems massively faster than in my case. Usually I get the steep decline to 92kW after only 30% SOC as shown above. Same as OP's charts. It has never charged appreciably faster than that. Under all circumstances never near the numbers in Bjørns video. I'll take it...

That seems really slow. In the video I linked to, Bjørn gets almost 40% in the same time. And that is even with the capped CCS adaptor.. Still hoping for _jmk to chime in on his current speeds. Although his earlier post on this page seems to indicate that he is no longer getting the speeds he...

Let's try and keep this OT: Can anyone with a rev G/H pack comment on their current SC rates?

So massive throttling after 10 minutes on those cars is considered normal? Anyway.. My battery is a rev G, so would reasonably expect it to perform better than the older X100 (BTX6) battery. And going by this video by Bjørn Nyland it should have no problem going @131 for almost double that...

Basically my best case scenario: 7% start. Throttling at 31% after 10 mins charging. Seems quite mediocre, maybe this is the new norm? This is on a V3 with CCS.

So this is no longer what you experience?

Any updates on this matter? I'm having the exact same problem. MX with G pack. Have a lot of charge graphs if you are still interested..

Are those numbers your own experience with supercharging? I haven't tried V3 yet as they're still quite rare here, but Tesla lists the CCS adaptor on their site as being able to deliver 250kw..

Where does the 105.3 usable capacity come from? I thought they were both 100kWh packs?

Sounds like it might have been a workmate doing the checking ;)

I would guess it was the first thing to be measured, since no hard info exists on either G or H packs. But testing a battery behind an advanced BMS should be far from trivial, so would also love some details if possible!

It seems like these two posts present contradicting evidence :) I'll try to get charge info from my G pack. Funny thing is that my car is registered as having a 114.6kWh battery when I look up my license plate :rolleyes:

Still not back from the shop? I picked up my X a few days ago and it's a G pack rev. Thanks, found it.

Interesting, I havent seen that one. Is it in one of his videos? Do you have a link?

Ok, so yours is with the 250kw theoretical max charge rate? Do you find it has a faster charge curve than what is generally known, or is it just a marketing ploy?

Well, since battery day came and went without any significant news (except ofc for the extremely disappointing timeframe), its safe to assume the correct answer to the question is nope. What is your battery rev. dmurphy?

No, everyone should of course reply. The thing is I don't expect glide to have a less than one-month-old MX. If I am mistaken - my sincere apologies. But even then, an answer of "nope" to a quite detailed post without any additional details comes off as really glib and thus not very...

Oh I'm sorry if I mistook your post as arrogant and unconstructive, when in fact it was apparently the exact opposite. I'm sure OP is happy you chimed in.. Good idea, best way to know for now. I must say my previous thought that the new batteries were already being put in cars pre-battery...

Ah the Honda Civic loving post padder returns. Thank you for your invaluable input on this matter also. On topic though, like jmk writes faster charging is only possible in case your battery capacity is smaller than earlier models - all else (charging power) being equal. Could theoretically...

Just to make sure you see my message from your '98 Civic bubble.

Glide: R&D isn't a money printing machine? (paraphrasing) It's not, unless the product has a clear functional advantage over the previous product. Otherwise I'll just start myself an R&D department reinventing the wheel. Only time will tell if Teslas new tech will be worth a price hike, see my...

I guess you don't get to 2k+ posts by writing with substance. "R&D" just doesn't remotely cut it for adressing my post. My points are valid, your point isn't even one. And about the Civic, apart from "who cares about your cherry picked case", I'm quite sure the price still is within 10% over...

Wrong. Tesla are losing market shares in most of EU and have generally lost the lead on specific points like charging speed and repeated launches. Even range is not best-in-class when Lucid Air comes out. Teslas have consistently dropped prices over the last few years, as has every other EV...

Why would prices go up? Project Roadrunner (1Mmile) is supposed to be much cheaper to produce. And thus, why wait to implement on the exact date of battery Day? Prices will change to reflect any advancements related directly to consumer experience - range/features/performance etc. I very much...

Depends upon how you look at it. Revisions can be something as trivial as "thicker wires", or it could be a fundamental change in cell manufacturing process - ultimately even the fabled "million-mile battery". The new revisions came around june AFAIK, and with the acquisitions of Maxwell and...

I strongly disagree on the first two points. I think you are confusing battery day with a new product unveiling, when in fact battery technology is applicable to all existing Tesla vehicles. That means battery day is extremely likely to impart the now-famous Osborne effect if the advantages are...

Hi there, To start off, there seem to be uncertainty of the real width of the car. Most sites will claim 1999 mm without mirrors, but a few are claiming 2070 (eg. automobiledimension.com). I suspect the former is correct, and the car should be comparable to a BMW X5 in width. I can't comment on...

What makes you think that the pickup-date should correlate with QC issues?

Interesting.. Whats the source for this info please?