Tesla sustained a burst rate of about 2,000+ Model 3 cars at the end of Q1 but was able to sustain about ~2,500 cars for all of Q2 as a rolling average.
I am going to with about 6,000 cars a week on a average for Q3 so about 70,000 cars for Q3. Especially considering that Tesla isn't going to hold back any shipments for Q3 and Q4 this year with the tax credit expiring.
Can we refrain from the use of the term "burst rate" when speaking of production? This reference is used by those who question everything about Tesla without any effort to understand definitions. And if it doesn't suit the goal of the short, there will be no understanding.
A burst rate is a test of one area of the factory to produce at a specified rate.
All the areas of the factory each on their own have to be tested at a similar burst rate to verify that the factory as a whole can run at that rate. After each area passes the test, running all the systems together will reveal whether it is a synchronized run and then it continues at that rate until such time as a tweak is performed and a new set of burst tests are conducted .
The simplified definition of burst rate is running a system at a higher rate than it had been operating,
A burst rate does not apply to operation of the factory. You don't have a burst rate for the factory; you have a run or production rate.
Whatever the total produced in a week is the current rate.
And as they ramp up, there are constant tweaks and downtime and more burst tests so that the run rate can be increased. But the burst only is for an area and not the factory. Synchronizing all the areas will yield a production rate at the speed of the slowest area. But it is not a burst rate for the factory.
I don't know how many ways to describe the difference between burst and production, but the amount produced in a week is not a result of a burst test. If someone else can be more concise and put an end to the misunderstanding, that would be great.