Starbucks were not subsidised by the government (although they are allowed to disgracefully abuse the tax system), plus there are generally alternatives.Better refer Starbucks too. What happens if you don't want Starbucks coffee at motorway services? And BP. What if you don't want to pay lots more for petrol?
SOL.
BP were not subsidised to my knowledge.
There have been regular campaigns over the years to manage motorway services fuel costs, and anyway with a little forethought you can always go to the previous/next one which is mostly run by an alternate operator.
Ecotricity have taken advantage of public funds to roll out charging points at motorway service centres in a dominant/monopolistic manner and are now actively blocking competition.
That is why they should be referred to the Competition Commission.
I don't actually blame the company involved (in this case Ecotricity), they are just being commercially astute, spotting the opportunity and maximising the potential, though I do absolutely blame them for a indefensible charging scheme.
It is our(succession of) idiot government(s) that has permitted this situation to arise by releasing taxpayers money as grants without sufficiently considering the consequences of subsequent market abuse, and as ever it is the man on the street that suffers from such incomptence.
Whether you are a fan of Brexit or not, one thing this country does need is a better political class. The thought of certain of the current inhabitants of Westminster steering the country into a new chapter is unnerving to say the least.
Last edited: