Nope.
Not explicitly representing AP functions is not the same thing as explicitly not representing AP functions. You can grasp that, right? Explicitly stating that the demonstration applies to the EAP package is not an explicit statement that it does not apply to other packages.
That makes 0 actual sense.
"Here's a video of what you get in Package A" is not telling you ANYTHING about what you get in something that is NOT package A.
It doesn't need to come with some insane troll logic dislclaimer saying "This video that is explicitly about Package A, that we TELL YOU AT THE START IS ABOUT PACKAGE A is
shockingly not about package B that didn't even exist when we made the video
It'd be like you insisting that a commercial about Hawaii needs to add in huge red letters "DESPITE ALSO BEING AN ISLAND, THIS COMMERCIAL IS NOT ABOUT FIJI!"
That's nonsensical.
It's inclusion in the new AP section implicitly represents the new AP package unless it explicitly says that it does not, which it does not.
Except it does.
First, it's not "included" in the "new" section.
it's left over from the old one.
And second, it
explicitly says it's about
enhanced Autopilot.
As explained you to, what, 20 times now?
How is that a nope? If the manual says that you get TACC & AS with EAP, then the answer to #1 is "yes".
No, it's not.
The manual says you get
the version of those described in the manual with EAP.
It makes a point of saying the features, as described in the manual,
only come with EAP and FSD.
Multiple times.
So if you have something that is
not EAP or FSD those descriptions of the features wouldn't apply to you.
Again, the statement wasn't about which packages included TACC & AP. The statement was that the feature sets of TACC & AP were well-documented. Yes or no?
The feautres included in TACC and AP
only if you have EAP or FSD are well documented in the manual.
You have neither. The new AP package has neither.
Again as already, repeated, excruciatingly, explained to you.
You're getting ahead of yourself. That's part of #4. But with respect to #3, The new AP package has a feature that Tesla calls Traffic Aware Cruise Control and another feature it calls Autosteer. Yes?
Yup. But they are different (autosteer in particular) compared to the versions offered in old EAP and new FSD.
Just as- again- they are different from how those features worked in AP1.
This appears to be another on the increasingly long list of nuanced differences you seem unable to grasp.
So, if you agree that Tesla was incompetent at communicating changes to their new offerings, and customers make purchasing decisions based on the incomplete or incorrect information provided by Tesla, why do you object to customers seeking a remedy?
If you choose to buy something when you don't have enough info, that's on you.
Now, if you didn't do enough research to find the correct info, but you ask Tesla directly to clarify before purchase, and you're given incorrect info in writing (email, chat, etc), I'd absolutely support you asking for a remedy (the remedy would be a refund FYI- they're not going to make a special version of the software
just for you that adds ALC to basic AP)
There's more than enough room for disagreement on that score.
You're certainly disagreeing, you're just objectively wrong about it- as proven to you over and over with direct quotes from the manual, the video, and every other relevant place, all showing the descriptions in question
explicitly state they only apply to EAP and/or FSD.