So, I just completed my autopilot free trial. It arrived at the perfect time: I was going on a 1300 mile drive split between two days (650 miles from SF Bay to Portland, 650 miles back) and it activated the very morning I was leaving. Cool.
So what did I think in my 30 day trial? I'll break it down.
1. Adaptive Cruise Control. Now this is, in general, a great feature for highway driving, and I really liked Tesla's implementation of it. It definitely reduced the amount of driving effort on the trip, and subjectively I felt significantly safer with it engaged than not. The biggest weak spot was when I neared an entry ramp and cars were coming up the ramp. It didn't see them until they were quite close and the result could be some hard braking. I learned that the drive was much more pleasant if I took care of those situations on manual rather than enduring autopilot turning routine merges into emergency braking situations. Still, a solid "A" grade from me. To get an "A+", I want to see better merging traffic behavior.
2. Lane Keeping. It sorta worked. Weather wasn't great on the trip and that made it cut out sometimes, and the twists and turns of I-5 in northern California and southern Oregon were not its friend, likewise causing it to cut out sometimes. Also, one time there was a car pulling a low trailer in a lane next to me, and the trailer was swinging back and forth across the lane divider, and the lane keeping didn't seem to see that this was happening. If I hadn't overridden it, I believe the result would have been an accident. On the long drive up the central valley, where traffic was light and the road straight, I used it. Otherwise, it was easier to just leave it off than to manage switching back and forth all the time. I'd give it a "C". Good enough to be useful in the right conditions, but nothing more than that.
3. Lane Changing. Hard to properly judge since it is still requiring manual approval of every lane change, which kind of defeats the purpose. Still, I don't think it ever made a lane change I thought was dangerous. Leaving aside the incomplete implementation, the main problem was the opposite of being too aggressive: it was really cautious regarding spacing. Turning up the aggressiveness made it change lanes more often than served any real point, but didn't adequately address the real problem of needing an excessive cushion. I only tried to let it exit the highway for me a few times, and mostly I had to override it to keep it from missing the exit because it wouldn't change lanes in traffic conditions where a lane change was fine. I'm giving it an "I" for incomplete.
Overall: Not paying $7,000 for it as it currently exists. If I commuted every day in heavy traffic I might very well feel differently - that adaptive cruise control is really nice. But since I don't, the price is too high. Offer me that adaptive cruise control unbundled for $3,000 and I'd be tempted; $2,000 and I'm in. As is, I'm watching Tesla's progression with autopilot with interest. For me, for $7,000 it has to do some next-level stuff beyond anything it does now. And that might happen. So, count me as a potential buyer, but no checkbook yet.
So what did I think in my 30 day trial? I'll break it down.
1. Adaptive Cruise Control. Now this is, in general, a great feature for highway driving, and I really liked Tesla's implementation of it. It definitely reduced the amount of driving effort on the trip, and subjectively I felt significantly safer with it engaged than not. The biggest weak spot was when I neared an entry ramp and cars were coming up the ramp. It didn't see them until they were quite close and the result could be some hard braking. I learned that the drive was much more pleasant if I took care of those situations on manual rather than enduring autopilot turning routine merges into emergency braking situations. Still, a solid "A" grade from me. To get an "A+", I want to see better merging traffic behavior.
2. Lane Keeping. It sorta worked. Weather wasn't great on the trip and that made it cut out sometimes, and the twists and turns of I-5 in northern California and southern Oregon were not its friend, likewise causing it to cut out sometimes. Also, one time there was a car pulling a low trailer in a lane next to me, and the trailer was swinging back and forth across the lane divider, and the lane keeping didn't seem to see that this was happening. If I hadn't overridden it, I believe the result would have been an accident. On the long drive up the central valley, where traffic was light and the road straight, I used it. Otherwise, it was easier to just leave it off than to manage switching back and forth all the time. I'd give it a "C". Good enough to be useful in the right conditions, but nothing more than that.
3. Lane Changing. Hard to properly judge since it is still requiring manual approval of every lane change, which kind of defeats the purpose. Still, I don't think it ever made a lane change I thought was dangerous. Leaving aside the incomplete implementation, the main problem was the opposite of being too aggressive: it was really cautious regarding spacing. Turning up the aggressiveness made it change lanes more often than served any real point, but didn't adequately address the real problem of needing an excessive cushion. I only tried to let it exit the highway for me a few times, and mostly I had to override it to keep it from missing the exit because it wouldn't change lanes in traffic conditions where a lane change was fine. I'm giving it an "I" for incomplete.
Overall: Not paying $7,000 for it as it currently exists. If I commuted every day in heavy traffic I might very well feel differently - that adaptive cruise control is really nice. But since I don't, the price is too high. Offer me that adaptive cruise control unbundled for $3,000 and I'd be tempted; $2,000 and I'm in. As is, I'm watching Tesla's progression with autopilot with interest. For me, for $7,000 it has to do some next-level stuff beyond anything it does now. And that might happen. So, count me as a potential buyer, but no checkbook yet.