MyWifeandI
Member
Also, free advice via THE TESLA DIMINISHED VALUE PROJECT | TESLA MOTORS AND AUTOMOBILE DIMINISHED VALUE IN ALL 50 STATES which will probably say 15% back of trade-in value at the time of the accident. Sorry for your tribulations.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll openly admit that I don't know enough about the DV process to confirm or refute most of what you said, but at a minimum this must be on a state-by-state basis. I have asked the police here in NC whether or not a police report alone can be sufficient to taint a vehicle history report, and the response I got was "no."Not true it’s the police report that will always show it.
Interesting! That definitely goes against some of the impressions I previously had. Thank you for sharing your outcome!Good (sort of?) news! Talked to the GEICO insurance adjuster now, and brought up my concerns on diminished value. He affirmed that it is right for me to question this, but because I'm not their insured and because the damage is minor at $1,000 they have no intention of reporting the accident details. His concern was that if a police report was made that it would be recorded, but because the damage was in fact minor, we did not file a police report the night of the accident. Thus, I don't have to worry about diminished value as a result of this accident being reported.
I did express concern that, even with his assurance to the contrary, if at a future point there is a blemish on the vehicle history report because they reported it, what would I do about DV then? He says that if/when that happens, call him back if he's still there at GEICO, or bring it up with the company at that time. I guess that's good enough for now.
Thanks again for all the help!
Good (sort of?) news! Talked to the GEICO insurance adjuster now, and brought up my concerns on diminished value. He affirmed that it is right for me to question this, but because I'm not their insured and because the damage is minor at $1,000 they have no intention of reporting the accident details. His concern was that if a police report was made that it would be recorded, but because the damage was in fact minor, we did not file a police report the night of the accident. Thus, I don't have to worry about diminished value as a result of this accident being reported.
I did express concern that, even with his assurance to the contrary, if at a future point there is a blemish on the vehicle history report because they reported it, what would I do about DV then? He says that if/when that happens, call him back if he's still there at GEICO, or bring it up with the company at that time. I guess that's good enough for now.
Thanks again for all the help!
Excellent advice!! The statute of limitations in California for a DV claim is 3 years, so I'll do that.Hope for the best - what GEICO says is true, will not be reported.
Plan for the worst - research the statute of limitations on DV suits in your state, wait until some time after your vehicle is repaired but before reaching the end of your window, purchase your CarFax to confirm the absence of an accident record. In my case, I checked six (6) months after the accident (which had both a police report and a high enough repair value that it would have been reported by the shop and/or insurance) and the accident WAS on the report.
Excellent advice!! The statute of limitations in California for a DV claim is 3 years, so I'll do that.
Just because it doesn't show up on carfax doesn't mean that a potential future buyer of your car won't know about it. It's pretty easy for someone who knows cars to determine that your rear bumper was repaired/repainted. If they are able to determine that, and then see NOTHING on the carfax that would probably cause them to run away even faster. In their mind, they have no idea what sort of damage you are hiding from them at that point
When/if I do sell the car, I do not plan to be dodgy about discussing this repair, even if it doesn't show up on the vehicle history report. If I was asked if it's been an accident I will truthfully say yes, it has, and describe the accident. I will have pictures of the minimal damage, and I will have the invoice of the repair work that was done ($1000 to primer and repaint the bumper). I can confidently say that there was not other significant damage, and this repair is akin to fixing a car that has been keyed or backed into a pole, e.g. nothing to worry about. If I am being transparent about it, I don't believe I would suffer a significant amount of diminished value as a result. And if I'm not selling to a private party, then no one really cares or asks, so we're all good too.
When/if I do sell the car, I do not plan to be dodgy about discussing this repair, even if it doesn't show up on the vehicle history report. If I was asked if it's been an accident I will truthfully say yes, it has, and describe the accident. I will have pictures of the minimal damage, and I will have the invoice of the repair work that was done ($1000 to primer and repaint the bumper). I can confidently say that there was not other significant damage, and this repair is akin to fixing a car that has been keyed or backed into a pole, e.g. nothing to worry about. If I am being transparent about it, I don't believe I would suffer a significant amount of diminished value as a result. And if I'm not selling to a private party, then no one really cares or asks, so we're all good too.
This might not be a popular opinion but if I were you, I would still press for Diminished Value.
Police report or not, the accident caused your car to be repainted and the car is worth less than a car that has not been repainted. The Geico agent did well in protecting his employer from having to pay for the damage but the way I see it, Diminished Value still applies because the car is worth less than an unrepainted car.
Good (sort of?) news! Talked to the GEICO insurance adjuster now, and brought up my concerns on diminished value. He affirmed that it is right for me to question this, but because I'm not their insured and because the damage is minor at $1,000 they have no intention of reporting the accident details. His concern was that if a police report was made that it would be recorded, but because the damage was in fact minor, we did not file a police report the night of the accident. Thus, I don't have to worry about diminished value as a result of this accident being reported.
That is odd. You are correct, I forgot that we have to file an SR-1 if the damage is over $1,000. GEICO is not my insurance, it is the other guy's insurance and I just went to them. So now that you mention it, it does seem odd that they say they won't be alerting DMV and putting it on my vehicle history, if by law they are supposed to.Since you are in California, you probably already know that you have to notify the DMV of any accident with over $1000 in damage. Even though you are not reporting it, GEIGO is not reporting it, it doesn't mean the guy hit you is not going to report it to DMV. He may have already done so since you are supposed to report it within 10 days after the accident. He will just be doing it to protect himself.
That is odd. You are correct, I forgot that we have to file an SR-1 if the damage is over $1,000. GEICO is not my insurance, it is the other guy's insurance and I just went to them. So now that you mention it, it does seem odd that they say they won't be alerting DMV and putting it on my vehicle history, if by law they are supposed to.