You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would guess he's not going to name it anything as I don't see interstellar travel being achieved in our lifetimes.So what is he going to name SpaceX's actual interstellar ship if Starship is already taken?
Elon Musk on TwitterThis is one of those things we can say ‘never’ and be comfortable with it.
Michael Wolman @mwolman98
Unless this "starship" is sent on a mission to another star system it can't be called a starship
···········
Elon Musk @elonmusk
Svar til @mwolman98
Later versions will
20:45 - 19. nov. 2018
Hmm...limited imagination. Never say “never”. Such statements have been made throughout human history and often been proven wrong. And ask Newton about the “basic laws of physics” and how they will never change. Then ask Einstein. They’ve changed, and they will continue to change was we learn more about the universe.No one is sending any probe let alone humans to any nearby stars. Not in our lifetime or anytime in the future.... ever.
This is one of those things we can say ‘never’ and be comfortable with it.
Basic laws of physics.
If one does not think beyond the timeline of a human generation, one cannot lay the foundation for future discoveries.I would guess he's not going to name it anything as I don't see interstellar travel being achieved in our lifetimes.
Nearest star is 4 light years away.If one does not think beyond the timeline of a human generation, one cannot lay the foundation for future discoveries.
I really hope you are wrong. But I also think you may be right.No one is sending any probe let alone humans to any nearby stars. Not in our lifetime or anytime in the future.... ever.
This is one of those things we can say ‘never’ and be comfortable with it.
Basic laws of physics.
No one is sending any probe let alone humans to any nearby stars. Not in our lifetime or anytime in the future.... ever.
This is one of those things we can say ‘never’ and be comfortable with it.
Basic laws of physics.
Indeed? And what basic laws of physics do you think say anything like that?No one is sending any probe let alone humans to any nearby stars. Not in our lifetime or anytime in the future.... ever.
This is one of those things we can say ‘never’ and be comfortable with it.
Basic laws of physics.
Actually, I think you're correct. However, while I'm pretty skeptical of them, the Singularity people likely would disagree. At a minimum they'd likely postulate a post-human machine being more than capable of traveling to a star, even if it took decades, or even centuries.I would guess he's not going to name it anything as I don't see interstellar travel being achieved in our lifetimes.
It is possible with more or less current technology, but it would have to be a generation starship.
Today, its theoretically possible to travel to other stars, but its really REALLY impractical to the point of being quite comfortably impossible. Depending on what technology you pick and who does the math, we're pretty much talking a best case of tens of thousands of years to get to to AC or PC.
So, "never"--in the context of today's technology--is quite correct.
When you say "basic" physics, are you referring to physics that isn't acid?Fuel cells cars will 'never' be more efficient than pure battery powered EVs. That is not a question of todays technology. It is basic physics.
https://www.quora.com/Will-we-ever-travel-to-other-stars/answer/Chris-Craddock
Fuel cells cars will 'never' be more efficient than pure battery powered EVs. That is not a question of todays technology. It is basic physics.
4.2441, to be more precise. I think everyone is aware of that. I certainly am. It does not change my position on the appropriateness of Elon changing the name of the BFR/BFS to “Starship”.Nearest star is 4 light years away.
And that has nothing to do with what we are discussing in this thread.Fuel cells cars will 'never' be more efficient than pure battery powered EVs. That is not a question of todays technology. It is basic physics.