You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know with an ICE car driving it like you stole it puts a heavy strain on the engine/trans and will greatly reduce their life. What about electric cars? Will having a heavy foot cause excessive wear?
Good video of a first gen Model S motor:In theory, yes, you're pushing the motors harder, leading to more heating in the windings and wires. In practice, I doubt there'll be any measurable difference in wear or failure rates for anything you can do on the streets. Electric motors tend to be a lot more reliable and less subject to wear.
I accelerate As Fast As I Can every chance I get.
I love my Model 3.
The gears in the drive train must be force-rated. I remember Force = Mass x Acceleration.
If the gear teeth are rated to withstand the Force the motor puts on them at max acceleration, they should be OK for the life of the car unless they are defective.
I cannot get enough of my car. I wish my commute was longer.
Yep. I agree.It's not that simple. You're describing an overload failure mode, which is just one of the ways parts can fail. Much more common is a fatigue failure, where a part can take the load, but fails after the load is put on and taken off a bunch of times - each time it takes the load, it does a tiny bit of damage that adds up over time.
With gears, that'd typically be a crack starting at the base of a tooth and gradually growing until the tooth snaps off.
I do think Tesla designed the system to handle a fair amount of abuse for an extended period, but all mechanical systems wear with use over time.
There's going to be more strain on the drivetrain, sure. The motor itself isn't likely to be the weak link, though. It is the gearing and housing, plus I'm far more worried about the increased wear on the battery than on the motor or even drive unit overall.
The RWD probably not, yeah, but the P is inherently at the border of cooking the battery (and maybe the power inverter). The degradation per kW is non-linear, the only question is how much Tesla decided to tolerate.Wear on the battery will be in the form of high discharge rates. And for that, you'd be most harsh with a performance or AWD since they power two motors instead of one. Given how many cells there are, I doubt this will really do much to the batteries in the Model 3 since the draw is shared across so many cells and the overall draw is not significant individually.
The RWD probably not, yeah, but the P is inherently at the border of cooking the battery (and maybe the power inverter). The degradation per kW is non-linear, the only question is how much Tesla decided to tolerate.
And the price is in the ball park of M3. I would bet Tesla makes more money on m3p than BMW makes on M3I guarantee part of the cost of the P3D is Tesla planning on additional warranty repairs of the motors in that version of the car.
I guarantee part of the cost of the P3D is Tesla planning on additional warranty repairs of the motors in that version of the car.