I'm going to take issue with you not using the subjunctive conjugation in this sentence.
What’s the Difference Between Was and Were?
And I'm going to take issue with your use of the word "conjugation." The subjunctive is a mood, not a conjugation.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm going to take issue with you not using the subjunctive conjugation in this sentence.
What’s the Difference Between Was and Were?
And I'm going to take issue with your use of the word "conjugation." The subjunctive is a mood, not a conjugation.
Fair enough. I blame my French classes, where it was always taught as a separate conjugation of the verb (subjunctive mood often has a special form in French, which is a huge PITA...honestly I was always just trying to remember the right root all the time, which meant my mood was always bad).
Looks like Tesla still has some work to do with traffic light recognition:
The HD map Elon is describing is the same HD map a driver familiar with the road has in his head. Only crowdsourced from cars and digitalized.
You can perfectly well drive at a new location without maps by vision only. But it doesn't make sense for a human driver to drive into the same pothole every day when you know it's there. In the same way it doesn't make sense that other Tesla's need to drive into the pothole once a few cars before you has.
Maps help, and they should definitely not be required to drive. If the road is covered in snow, they help you know where the lanes split and merge, even if you don't see the marks on the road. In the same way a familiar driver would know, however a new driver would likely drive elsewhere because he doesn't know the lanes under the snow.
If you need maps for anything other than finding a route to your destination, it's not generalized.
Your statement is internally inconsistent.
If you use lidar data as a reason to ignore your vision data, then lidar is your primary sensor (not a redundant one) (plastic bag versus tire in road). If you ignore your vision data because it doesn't match your HD map, then the map is the primary data source (construction bypass) . If you cease operation because of a data conflict, you're giving both sources equal billing and made your system more brittle.
You can't have a 'helping' sensor, you either rely on it or you don't.
(Yes, there can be edges cases where lidar detects an object that vision does not, but that should be fixed by improving the vision system. On Teslas, the radar covers the majority of that space)
Trite, but fun, saying from the days of sailing ships:
When you go out to sea, never take 2 clocks, either one or three...
Elon has been very restrained recently. I am waiting for his tweet declaring feature complete full self driving is coming next week.
Maybe he's learned his lesson regarding the prediction of time lines?
Maybe he's learned his lesson regarding the prediction of time lines? Sometimes when I'm on a trip, or hiking, or paddling, I don't want to be told "We're half-way there," "We're 3/4 of the way there" "We're just ten minutes away." Sometimes I just want to plod on until we've arrived. Sometimes it's really nice, when you think you've still got an hour to go, to suddenly realize you're on the summit. Or you're paddling and your arms are getting sore and you're starting to wonder how much longer you can keep it up, and suddenly the steersman makes a sharp 90° turn and you realize you're headed straight for the beach where you're going to land.
Instead of making promises and then revising them and revising them, with all the bad press that entails, wouldn't it be great if one day they just released the firmware version that could do City NoA? And then one day, without prior announcement, they just released Level 3? And one day, with no previous indication or announcement, cars appeared on the showroom floor without driver controls, and ready for purchase?
I wish you were right. More likely, someone will ask him on Twitter when "City NOA" will be released and he won't be able to help himself. He'll tweet a reply like "FSD rewrite is almost done. I'm testing it now in my development car. Will probably go to Early Access next week if all goes well."
I wish you were right. More likely, someone will ask him on Twitter when "City NOA" will be released and he won't be able to help himself. He'll tweet a reply like "FSD rewrite is almost done. I'm testing it now in my development car. Will probably go to Early Access next week if all goes well."
If only airplanes would ditch those stupid triple redundancy computer and sensor system
NO! The system that went rogue did so based on only ONE of its two sensors to make its decision that the pilot needed an “override”. Even though the aircraft certification required it to have TWO of the (AOA) sensors...... Boeing sold the MCAS system redundancy to compare the two as an extra $$$$ option that the accident plane did not have.Didn't the 737-Max?
At least the part that killed people.
I bet everyone is going to check the box for that software upgrade now though! Real marketing geniuses over there at Boeing.NO! The system that went rogue did so based on only ONE of its two sensors to make its decision that the pilot needed an “override”. Even though the aircraft certification required it to have TWO of the (AOA) sensors...... Boeing sold the MCAS system redundancy to compare the two as an extra $$$$ option that the accident plane did not have.
Being a good chip designer doesn't make you a subject matter expert on all possible programming and computer science algorithms that run on your chip.To be honest, the only "naive and clueless" person in this scenario are those who have NOT worked on the problem.
This man's experience and his expertise is not in question.
Yours on the other hand...
It's been crickets for software releases which in my mind means that the entire software team is involved in model Y updates and FSD update, both the driving software and UI changes. Maybe he is going to sell the first model Y with FSD V1 enabled? Great way to kick off the program.Elon has been very restrained recently. I am waiting for his tweet declaring feature complete full self driving is coming next week.
It's been crickets for software releases which in my mind means that the entire software team is involved in model Y updates and FSD update, both the driving software and UI changes. Maybe he is going to sell the first model Y with FSD V1 enabled? Great way to kick off the program.