STS-134
Active Member
The only thing that's living rent-free with respect to Twitter that won't end up owing any rent in the future is Jack Sweeney in Elon's head.Why, are offices rent-free in Texas? Just kidding!
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only thing that's living rent-free with respect to Twitter that won't end up owing any rent in the future is Jack Sweeney in Elon's head.Why, are offices rent-free in Texas? Just kidding!
Maybe not…. “While Californians headed east are drawn in by the promise of affordable suburban tract homes, many of the Texans bound in the other direction are recent college graduates seeking a fresh start to their young careers and lives. California continually attracts talents — and drains brains — from Texas.”Everyone knows the best IT talent is in TX.
If I was Elon I’d have immediately shuttered the SF and SEA offices permanently and moved the whole thing to Texas.
Worth.It would be hilarious if/when it's reported that no one in Texas will lease office space to them unless they paid 1 year+ upfront.
SF def not a great place to live in many ways but be careful what you ask for. Austin will eventually wind up with even more overcrowding and sprawl than it has now.Worth.
It.
Yeah Austin is a mess. I would hope he would pick San Antonio or DFW instead but that may be too thin a spread.SF def not a great place to live in many ways but be careful what you ask for. Austin will eventually wind up with even more overcrowding and sprawl than it has now.
And that’s where he’d move it, really the only place in Texas that would work.
And while Bay Area and Seattle have their own easy to mock social issues, Texas state government is a pretty sad joke.
Well, it’s the “public town square”… hopefully the guys in the orange jump suits don’t show up next.. I wonder if they would put a stop to that.. I wonder if there is anyone AT Twitter even working on moderation, banning and filtering? From my last contacts who WERE inside and some who are still inside, most of that group including leadership has been fired or left.Great job Elon.. now the Taliban are hosting Twitter Spaces in support of Andrew Tate. Unbelievable.
View attachment 891558
Surprise surprise that M$N would post something like that.
Surprise surprise that M$N would post something like that.
That’s what I find myself asking often.Why the constant hate?
It's the classic strategy of can't find a problem with the message, but don't like the message, so attack the messenger.It's actually a market watch article I think. One thing I don't understand about all your comments is this article is facts. Tesla missed delivery estimates. Why the constant hate?
It's not like an opinion piece. Tesla missed delivery numbers...everything with stocks is future, expectactions based. We'll see what people/the market thinks.
Constantly see that from the folks who want to see Elon keelhauled for the mortal sin of going against the “approved” narrative.It's the classic strategy of can't find a problem with the message, but don't like the message, so attack the messenger.
It's only the Elon worshippers that I see attacking articles with empirical facts not for getting facts wrong but for publishing facts they don't like. It's one thing to refute facts by showing facts are wrong and another to attack the source without providing any evidence that it got the facts wrong, or providing additional data that shows another trend.Constantly see that from the folks who want to see Elon keelhauled for the mortal sin of going against the “approved” narrative.
We've all gotten really used to seeing endless articles chock full of facts like "Teslas catch fire!!!" Absolutely true, but useless without the necessary context (never provided) "... at 10% the rate of comparable ICE vehicles".It's only the Elon worshippers that I see attacking articles with empirical facts not for getting facts wrong but for publishing facts they don't like. It's one thing to refute facts by showing facts are wrong and another to attack the source without providing any evidence that it got the facts wrong, or providing additional data that shows another trend.
Sure, and providing that additional data is how you bring context to those types of articles. Saying "Well, the article is by news outlet X, they just publish crap about Tesla again and again" on the other hand is attacking the messenger and not the message.We're all gotten really used to seeing endless articles chock full of facts like "Teslas catch fire!!!" Absolutely true, but useless without the necessary context (never provided) "... at 10% the rate of comparable ICE vehicles".
Just look at the pictures Elon has posted. its this. They either work at Twitter with their H1B visas or leave the country at this point. It’s a great way to manage talent.I don't understand why anyone is still working at Twitter, aside from people trapped by visas or other personal circumstances, such as illness in the family.