dazedNconfuzed
Member
Yeah. Feigning failure? really? He has enough real failure to deal with, and while he spins it well and learns great lessons, zero reason to fake a high-profile "oops".
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very, very interesting Randy, very suspicious too at that they had just a pair of DRIVER SIDE DOOR GLASS just waiting to go! ... lol... and nothing else, no body panels... just side glass... lol.
Oh, and another thing probably nobody else noticed.
The little "ball drop test rig" they had to demonstrate the CT glass? That was rigged. My friend and I went over to look at it, and despite being "shooed away" by a teenage rent-a-cop (we didn't leave).. the clamps holding the CT glass to the frame were quite flexible (not sure how to describe it). So when the ball dropped, the glass had quite a bit of room to move to absorb the force of the ball. The non-CT glass was clamped down hard to make sure it would break.
"Remember these words after the windows broke?... “Elon = Well there’s room for improvement!” My prediction will be once this baby is ready for prime time production, Elon will have another event where hundreds of large steel balls will rain down from above while air cannons fire even more from the sides but NOTHING WILL BREAK this time.... Elon will then step to the mic with that huge Musk grin of his and say... “Ummm... I guess we improved it!... now come and get it!!!” ... or something to that effect!"
I'm not sure how that proves anything other than a brilliant marketing plan to take advantage of an unfortunate accident. The past is the past.. nothing wrong with moving forward with a good plan to exploit that. Doesn't mean for a second that the CT demo was staged.
If you watch bullet proof glass get shot, it cracks but it stops the bullet. .
This is the problem with human memory. There was, in fact, no bullet-proof glass demo or video. The glass was never claimed or demonstrated to be bullet-proof. The video you're thinking of was the stainless steel skin being shot at with a 9mm round. NOT THE GLASS.
Start video at about 8m15s:
Also, at around 11m20s, you can see when the ball is dropped from the top of the drop tube on to the CT glass -- ALL of the red clamps holding the glass break loose. At lower drops on the CT glass one or two clamps would break loose. But at the highest drop, they all did... which dissipated A LOT of the force from the ball drop preventing the glass from breaking.
I'd stepped out of the room for a minute during that fiasco. Came back in, saw the break, saw Elon rolling with it, figured it was a planned part of the show. Had seen the "bounce" tests, understood the physics involved, thought the point was the ball still hadn't gotten thru the glass; if it could stop that, I'm fine with it.I didn’t think the demo was a failed demo.
This is the problem with human reading comprehension. There was, in fact, no ‘a Cybertruck has bulletproof glass’ statement in my post. The reference was an analogy (def: a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification). Typical automotive glass shatters. Bullet proof glass breaks, but it still performs its function of stopping a bullet. I was amazed that the Cybertruck glass didn’t break similar to, but not exactly like, bullet proof glass. Therefore, that’s why I didn’t think the demo was a failed demo.
What else in my post(s) need clarification?
I totally agree.I agree it wasn’t staged, AND, it was marketing genius by accident.