You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Biofuels, especially ethanol, are an environmental disaster. Those of us actually researching renewables for years know this.Really surprised how many people in this thread disagree with renewable energy requirements - that is the "green" part of the green new deal.
Biofuels, especially ethanol, are an environmental disaster.
So Biden is an environmental disaster, increasing the biofuel mandates in 2022 above the 2020 and 2021 levels?Try this one, about the same story, but with a different headline:
U.S. EPA to recommend higher biofuel mandates for 2022 than 2021, 2020 - sources By Reuters
U.S. EPA to recommend higher biofuel mandates for 2022 than 2021, 2020 - sourceswww.investing.com
Another environmental concern is agrichemicals.So Biden is an environmental disaster, increasing the biofuel mandates in 2022 above the 2020 and 2021 levels?
The Tesla Bot may take care of that. think about robots picking the weeds and doing other tasks that fossil fuel machinery is doing today. Remember, they work 24/7 (less any maintenance) and can run on sunlight. A lot of robots can be purchased for the price of a modern combine.Another environmental concern is agrichemicals.
That part of it is, yes. Doesn't mean his entire plan is an environmental disaster, as much as you like to play with simplistic absolutes. It's the overall impact of the entire plan that matters, no one rational thinks a corporate centrist Dem like Biden is really going to take the bold action needed.So Biden is an environmental disaster, increasing the biofuel mandates in 2022 above the 2020 and 2021 levels?
Scientist disagrees with you. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment...hen-it-comes-to-climate-change-065201949.htmlThat part of it is, yes. Doesn't mean his entire plan is an environmental disaster, as much as you like to play with simplistic absolutes. It's the overall impact of the entire plan that matters, no one rational thinks a corporate centrist Dem like Biden is really going to take the bold action needed.
The Tesla Bot may take care of that. think about robots picking the weeds and doing other tasks that fossil fuel machinery is doing today. Remember, they work 24/7 (less any maintenance) and can run on sunlight. A lot of robots can be purchased for the price of a modern combine.
But long term could be very disruptive (like EVs, SpaceX, solar, batteries, etc.)Tesla Bot was the Musk salesmanship and PR piece of AI Day. Don't take it seriously as any kind of near term thing.
Try to post relevant content please.Scientist disagrees with you. Greta Thunberg claims Biden is not acting 'as seriously as we need' when it comes to climate change
That part of it is, yes. Doesn't mean his entire plan is an environmental disaster, as much as you like to play with simplistic absolutes. It's the overall impact of the entire plan that matters, no one rational thinks a corporate centrist Dem like Biden is really going to take the bold action needed.
if you watched presentation at around 2hr 10 min Elon says “cars are semi-sentient”Tesla Bot was the Musk salesmanship and PR piece of AI Day. Don't take it seriously as any kind of near term thing.
But long term could be very disruptive (like EVs, SpaceX, solar, batteries, etc.)
Elon often misses "deadlines" but usually does come through.
Elon Musk says a lot of things.if you watched presentation at around 2hr 10 min Elon says “cars are semi-sentient”
that he does, and i tend to lean towards what he says, since he is instantiating much that has been speculated about a lot sooner than expected by many folks.Elon Musk says a lot of things.
As I said, Elon is often late from his overly ambitious time goals; but, he almost always delivers.""I feel pretty good about this goal. We'll be able to do a demonstration guide of full autonomy all the way from LA to New York. So basically from home in LA to Times Square in New York. And then have the car go and park itself by the end of next year,"
Elon Musk, October 2016.
On this one, Elon Musk has been shown to be out of his depth, having had his statements be thoroughly wrong, multiple times.
Just look at the personnel changes and the hardware iterations.
The bot was just piling a headline grabber on something Tesla hasn't delivered. It worked, of course.
Late is an understatement. In 2016 he said _1 year_ and they still haven't even delivered on that.As I said, Elon is often late from his overly ambitious time goals; but, he almost always delivers.
Difficult stuff is delivered quickly, the impossible takes a little longer.
Not out of his depth. Not wrong.
What's wrong with improving hardware?