The Israelis have been lucky thus far that the West Bank has stayed out of what is going on in Gaza. But for how much longer?
‘We Are Not Very Far From an Explosion’
‘We Are Not Very Far From an Explosion’
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In a surprise move, an Iran-linked militia in Iraq that the Pentagon said was likely responsible for a lethal drone attack on a U.S. base in Jordan over the weekend announced on Tuesday that it was suspending military operations in Iraq under pressure from the Iraqi government and from Iran.
The announcement came shortly after President Biden said that he had decided how to respond to the attack in Jordan on Sunday that left three U.S. soldiers dead, though he did not say what that response would be. His comment raised fears in Iraq about a possibly retaliatory U.S. attack on its territory.
I don’t get…Iran admits it is in complete control of these groups…then proves it. So they disband….then what?…reform under a different banner or get absorbed into Iran’s web of similar groups.Iran seems to be backing away from a direct confrontation with the US. And on this page is an article about the terrorists who launched attacks on US bases deciding to call it quits as well. The US doesn't give a pass to terrorists so even if these scumbags fade back into the sewers they will be hunted.
Iran Suggests It Doesn’t Want War After U.S. Warning Over Drone Attack
They may be terrorists. But was the hospital a command center? That's a leap.I think setting up terrorist command centers in civilian hospitals more than meets the definition.
Is anyone claiming that the 3 Palestinians killed were civilians and not terrorist leaders?
I would change that doctor, not the hospital. I think that is the part you are missing. Fire & prosecute the 12 (allegedly) involved. Why punish 2.3 million people in Gaza, when they need the help most? Do you not believe the news articles that people are at the point of starving to death?I understand and empathize with your frustration about cutting funding to UNRWA, but if you're paying a doctor to heal you and that doctor is making things worse, you'd switch doctors, wouldn't you?
I disagree. I either write about Israeli army, or Israel as a government. Or sometimes I specifically mention Netanyahu or use the word "Israeli ministers". I have made that clear several times, since I was called an antisemite by several users.Looking at the quotes you pulled up and your assertion that you "share info on Israel's..." I think the bigger problem is that you conflate the extremist minority leadership of Israel with ALL Israel, and fail to distinguish between Hamas (leadership of Gaza) and Gaza citizens (who happened to have elected Hamas as their leadership) and Palestinians who don't support Hamas. What the split is between Hamas supporters and "innocent Palestinian victims" is hard to discern. In each of the quotes you pulled, you've left out the context, and failed to see that you do the same thing, only worse.
If a hospital was hurting you, you would check out of the hospital.I would change that doctor, not the hospital. I think that is the part you are missing. Fire & prosecute the 12 (allegedly) involved. Why punish 2.3 million people in Gaza, when they need the help most? Do you not believe the news articles that people are at the point of starving to death?
Again, I disagree. The wording is all inclusive of Gazans or sometimes Gazans and West Bankers. Maybe the intention was not that, but the wording is all inclusive.I understand and empathize with your frustration about cutting funding to UNRWA, but if you're paying a doctor to heal you and that doctor is making things worse, you'd switch doctors, wouldn't you? Same thing with UNWRA - allowing employees to murder/rape/terrorize innocent civilians is beyond the pale. That's pretty gross negligence. They have one job to do: improve the lives of Palestinian refugees and instead, they instigated the destruction of Gaza. How can you *not* realize that Israel had no choice but to defend itself after that terrorist attack? This is basically "suicide by cop" at a national level. And UNWRA *was* an accomplice if their very employees participated, and also if the education they supported included the kind of hateful indoctrination that madodel and indysurfer have shown.
Looking at the quotes you pulled up and your assertion that you "share info on Israel's..." I think the bigger problem is that you conflate the extremist minority leadership of Israel with ALL Israel, and fail to distinguish between Hamas (leadership of Gaza) and Gaza citizens (who happened to have elected Hamas as their leadership) and Palestinians who don't support Hamas. What the split is between Hamas supporters and "innocent Palestinian victims" is hard to discern. In each of the quotes you pulled, you've left out the context, and failed to see that you do the same thing, only worse.
Please refer to collection below:
This is just a true statement. If a nation continues to terrorize its neighbors, they are waging war and will not have peace. Gazans elected Hamas to lead them into war. Bad choice. Very bad choice. As long as history has been written down, and probably before, innocent (and complicit) citizens have been led into war and paid the ultimate price for their leaders' bad decisions. War sucks. That's why most civilized nations try to avoid it. Terrorist attacks on neighboring countries (Germany and Japan in WW2, Russia in February 2022, Gaza 10/7/23) commits the aggressor nations and the victim nations to warfare.
Why do you have trouble understanding this principle? It doesn't mean Israel was blameless, and yes, Israel has had better leaders who were more encouraging of peaceful solutions, but from what I'm hearing, the current leadership will be gone as soon as possible precisely because a lot of Israeli citizens would rather not have a hawkish extremist. In fact, if I recall correctly, before the terrorist attacks, there were demonstrations against him.
This is why Gazans made that very bad choice. You're also taking this statement out of context, it is actually explaining why the "average Palestinian" in a specific video held certain opinions.
First quote perfectly points out the distinction that you're missing. Indysurfer does not equate the "radical element" to "all Gazans", but believes they are the majority. Since the majority of Gazans apparently voted for Hamas, and based on the polls I've heard, this is a reasonable opinion.
Simplistically looking at the leadership of each country and blaming all the citizens for the mistakes/flaws of the leader is fine if you do it BOTH ways.
But it's still not a useful or helpful debate or discussion.
I suppose this is where we disagree. You may be seeing Gazans/Palestinians as terrorizing their neighbors, but there are couple of issues with that statement. First, are they really neighbors? Both Gaza and West Bank are occupied territory. Second, how do you differentiate between armed resistance to the occupier and terrorism?This is just a true statement. If a nation continues to terrorize its neighbors, they are waging war and will not have peace.
I agree it was a bad choice. But do you know that election happened in 2006? That's 17 years ago. Gaza population was 473,257. Assume half of them is children. IIRC, hamas won by a small margin, so let's call that half the votes. So roughly 120,000 people elected hamas. Gaza's population is 2,300,000 people today. I think it is a lame excuse to say Gazans elected hamas. And this is without going into how Israel government, especially Netanyahu financially helped hamas. And how, after the election, they erected the fence/wall, punishing Gazans. You can turn the nicest person in the world to a terrorist if you deny them basic human rights for 17 years, while randomly and periodically killing their family members.Gazans elected Hamas to lead them into war. Bad choice.
You are making a leap. All we have is that 12 people allegedly took part in Oct 7th. Now you are saying the organization is supporting terrorism. That is a massive leap.If a hospital was hurting you, you would check out of the hospital.
Organization is hurting the Gazans by supporting terrorism.
Therefore stop funding them until they fix their problem.
So if you're getting stabbed in the hospital by the nurses, you wouldn't check out?You are making a leap. All we have is that 12 people allegedly took part in Oct 7th. Now you are saying the organization is supporting terrorism. That is a massive leap.
By the way, let's say it is that way. That UNRWA is somehow supporting terrorism. Why pull the support now? When people need it most. Back to your hospital analogy, you may have a problem with the hospital, but if you were stabbed 10 times, you would not go out and search for a new hospital. You would use the problematic hospital still.
You should not punish the organization for the acts of 0.1% of their employees. You should punish the employees.
Especially if the organization is responsible for the basic needs of the people in a war.
By your analogy, no organization is safe from being defunded based on actions from individuals
I see very little on this thread that isn't just a disingenuous repetition of Israeli propaganda. It's an embarrassment that people here can't admit there's a difference between what is true and what Israel claims.Before you got active on this thread it was full of useful information and opinions.
I don't think I'm the only one who would appreciate if you would read more, post less.
Up is down, black is white.Since, at this point, the immediate violence will stop whenever Israel stops, that means it's currently entirely Israel's fault.
No, that's just a bizarre belief based on a lifetime of being lied to and believing it.If Israel stopped operations in Gaza today, the rockets would continue to fly into Israel, hostages would continue to be raped and murdered, and Hamas would continue to plan the next 10/7 terrorism attacks. That's simply the sad reality of the situation.
"Other benefactors" include Netanyahu and his cronies. Well documented. (A brief history of the Netanyahu-Hamas alliance | Opinion)But Hamas exists today in its current form mostly because it began long before as a genocidal monster and since has been deeply funded and otherwise enabled by Iranian and other benefactors.
it will stop when Palestinians stop waging rape jihad on neighboring music festivalswill stop whenever Israel stops
Nonsense. The violence is owned by Israel now. At least 99% of all the violence going on is perpetrated by Israel now. If they stop, the violence stops.it will stop when Palestinians stop waging rape jihad on neighboring music festivals