You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mod:And once more pages and pages of discussions on FSD just to rehash the stale arguments both ways from the same usual suspects with no original thought that would be relevant for investors today. Please mods, make any discussion of FSD off topic and start handing out time outs for those who can’t seem to keep themselves out of those useless back and forths.
Edit: I don't think people who have no experience in this sort of thing understand how difficult it is for a computer to recognize objects. Here's a seemingly simple case (with no life or death consequences if an error is made): take a single Landsat 8 image set and categorize all of the parts of the image. A person with minimal training can do it in a fraction of a second: here's a cloud, here's the cloud's shadow, here's water, here's land, here's a road, a city, farmland, a glacier, snow, etc. Now try to write code that does this automatically from a single image set. Impossible, even with many extra channels of non-visible wavelengths that indicate temperature. How do Google Maps and the other "cloudfree" image suppliers manage to overcome this problem and extract just the land portion of the imagery? Brute force. They basically take all the samples of a given 30 meter pixel over several years, sort them by the red channel, then take the median sample as the "real" state of that part of the Earth. I'm simplifying but that's the gist of it.
Why do you feel that's wrong? Robotaxis, which we expect will be heavily utilized, should displace a larger number of mostly idle, personally-owned vehicles. The total number of vehicle miles traveled, however, is likely to increase.[Musk] imagines that robotaxis will reduce the total number of cars in service. That is just wrong.
Tesla, under Musk's leadership, has proven adept at learning quickly when it's essential. While Tesla's support infrastructure has been less than ideal for vehicles and home energy, it hasn't been bad enough to kill sales. When the time comes, I think they'll find a way to make Tesla Network work.Please consider Tesla's record on supporting customer service, and ask what the odds are that they can competently implement and operate something like AirBNB. I would say 0.01% odds. Turo already does a good job. Tesla does not know how.
I'm assuming that Drew Baglino is very sharp and willing to learn quickly. Good technical management skills are certainly transferable across domains.Mr Havlak's group now has a total ignoramus (about self driving) in charge, so it will continue to make little to no progress until Baglino moves to another job or is fired.
As long as Tesla continues to make demonstrable FSD progress, and as long as they remain at least competitive with Waymo and Cruise, I think it's unlikely that they'll ever have to return deposits. To prevail against Tesla in an FSD refund lawsuit, I think a plaintiff would have to make a very strong case that Tesla acted in bad faith in accepting those deposits, which I firmly believe has not been the case.I do want to know how much in FSD deposits they have taken, because they will have to refund a lot of it.
Q1 was a huge factor, but I agree that Autonomy Day left many investors with the idea that Musk is delusional. To most people, the idea of FSD being ready in less than two years just seems so "out there". Personally, I see Elon as extremely optimistic, but not to the degree that I'd call him delusional. It seems to me that there is a small chance of Level 4 autonomy actually being achieved in 2020, though I wouldn't be surprised if FSD takes another five years. Elon's extreme optimism has been critical in getting us this far, both with Tesla and with SpaceX.I am beginning to think that the stock price is low not because of Q1, but because Autonomy Day demonstrated that Musk is actually delusional. And many investors don't want to invest in a stock with a delusional CEO.
Never going to happen. I, however, will relish Musk's admission that he massively underestimated the difficulty of full self driving and that it's "really really hard" (like he says about manufacturing). I think Musk having this realization is a prerequisite for actually getting full self-driving, so once it happens, watch out, I will become a full-self-driving bull.I’m so going to relish the day you’ll be eating crow for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Imo the moon landing was a much harder problem in the context of 1969 technology v FSD today. But the standards and stakes are a lot different. And unfortunately there hasn't really been a national or international effort for FSD, which is a shame if you consider how many lives it could have saved if Obama or Bush had made a "we choose to go to the moon..." type speech for FSD. I think you could probably consider FSD a solved problem today or even several years ago by moon landing standards if it was only going to risk the lives of a handful of men that had already signed their lives away. The difference is FSD puts millions of people instantly at risk, as well as whatever company is selling it, and it has to be signed off by insurance, regulators, municipalities. So the margin of error has to be tiny before FSD is released for public use, while I would guess the moon landings probably had a much lower standard.The moon landing became a solved problem as soon as staged, engine-gimballed, liquid-fueled rockets became reality. It was simply a matter of scale.
FSD is not a solved problem. You could run Tesla's software on the world's fastest supercomputer, and it still wouldn't be FSD. The goal is to make it a solved problem.
That sounds a lot like how you solve FSD too. Not saying it's not hard but going to the moon fifty years ago was a pretty different ball game than FSD today.Full self-driving was being promised in the 1920s by the same fools who didn't understand what was hard and what wasn't.
Sure, it'll happen sometime, if humanity doesn't get wiped out by global warming first (which is actually perfectly likely given how long self-driving might take).
Landing on the moon was basically just a matter of getting accurate calculations and suitable materials, and then spending a lot of money.
Um, no. You don't seem to know what a "first principle" is. It's not heuristics or best practices. It's stuff that if you fail to pay attention to you simply fail. Stuff like gravity and speed of light in a vacuum.Sure there is... just to name a few:
SOLID - Wikipedia
But more specifically with Tesla and FSD you should look to Karpathy and what he says about the topic:
A Recipe for Training Neural Networks
He has quite a bit more to say about it if you go down that rabbit hole... but none of this is unique to Tesla. Everyone trying to reach FSD are essentially using the same machine learning approach. It's the data advantage combined with a big lead in software and hardware which separates them from others aiming for FSD.
Would we not be more wisely evaluating the impact on Tesla and our investments of a gradual entry in areas with congenial surroundings geographically, governmentally, societally and economically?
Somehow in this thread and elsewhere we have completely lost our grasp of reality. Neroden tells us it will be ten years and that the Tesla approach is wrong.
They've done studies you know, 60% of the time it works every time!You have a major misconception about autonomy...91% percent of Americans are convinced they are better than average drivers. Even if that were possible, it would not be saying much. Because, statistically speaking, humans are terrible drivers. The bar to entry is very low indeed.
surmountable?Afaik, there is no major new tech which needs to be invented for FSD, merely it is a matter of scaling the data collection for areas like traffic lights and parking lots, and then using it to train the NNs, so in a way you can think of it as similar to just scaling up rockets to reach the moon.
As a side note, what is the word for when a problem is solvable - its on the tip of my tongue and is something like tractable??
Why do you feel that's wrong?
Common belief. Also totally false.Robotaxis, which we expect will be heavily utilized, should displace a larger number of mostly idle, personally-owned vehicles.
Yeah. Tesla Network is thankfully not essential, which is probably why they haven't learned quickly.The total number of vehicle miles traveled, however, is likely to increase.
Tesla, under Musk's leadership, has proven adept at learning quickly when it's essential.
Maybe it'll never come. I mean, demand for Tesla purchases will keep being very high indefinitely. Who needs Tesla Network? Certainly not Tesla.While Tesla's support infrastructure has been less than ideal for vehicles and home energy, it hasn't been bad enough to kill sales. When the time comes, I think they'll find a way to make Tesla Network work.
Sure. Who knows. He'll have the learning curve of realizing how hard the problem is, though, and he's probably starting from zero there.I'm assuming that Drew Baglino is very sharp and willing to learn quickly. Good technical management skills are certainly transferable across domains.
OK. That sounds wrong to me, though. Do you know the law in this area?As long as Tesla continues to make demonstrable FSD progress, and as long as they remain at least competitive with Waymo and Cruise, I think it's unlikely that they'll ever have to return deposits. To prevail against Tesla in an FSD refund lawsuit, I think a plaintiff would have to make a very strong case that Tesla acted in bad faith in accepting those deposits, which I firmly believe has not been the case.
Q1 was a huge factor, but I agree that Autonomy Day left many investors with the idea that Musk is delusional. To most people, the idea of FSD being ready in less than two years just seems so "out there". Personally, I see Elon as extremely optimistic, but not to the degree that I'd call him delusional. It seems to me that there is a small chance of Level 4 autonomy actually being achieved in 2020, though I wouldn't be surprised if FSD takes another five years. Elon's extreme optimism has been critical in getting us this far, both with Tesla and with SpaceX.
The best tech for sequestering carbon is planting more trees (from an economic perspective).
The insistence that it's either level 5 "I can sleep in the trunk" FSD or nothing is confusing. In looking at autopilot build out, why wouldn't FSD follow the same patterns? Limited situations with monitoring at first, then rolling out more functionality.
At the risk of contradicting you today, this approach you talk about is heuristic.... the old way of doing AI with a bunch of rules.
How long will it take to solve FSD? Consider two scenarios:
FAST: FSD is solvable within few years
SLOW: FSD is solvable in a few decades
Under the SLOW scenario, Tesla make disappointing progress on FSD for many years, but continues to bring new models to market and scale up production. Tesla share prices grows toward $1000 over next 10 years.
Under FAST scenario, two possibilities arise:
FAST COMPETITOR: competitor beats Tesla to FSD
FAST TESLA: Tesla beats competitors to FSD
Under FAST TESLA scenario, Tesla dominates robotaxi business and disrupts the rest of the auto industry. Tesla share price goes to $10,000.
Under FAST COMPETITOR scenario: Other competitor dominates robotaxi business and disrupts Tesla. Share price goes to $1.
The only thing that matters in the short run for the stock price, is whether Tesla can benefit financially from whatever FSD capability they have.
That would be interesting to know how much unaccounted revenue there is for that, they've been selling it for ? years now. It's called the revenue recognition principle, cash can come in whenever, but the revenue doesn't get booked until the product/service is delivered.What is the Revenue Recognition Principle? - Definition | Meaning | ExampleDoesn't Tesla have a substantial amount of FSD revenue that can't be booked until they roll it out? So, as features become useable and are released, they will add revenue to each quarter in which the features are delivered? In other words, a lot of people have already paid for FSD but the money hasn't been recognized as income yet?
I've always avoided accounting so I'm no expert!