Yes, you are going thru what I went thru anyway. Note that in v6, the IC was different and actually in the center, you had your battery displayed much bigger, making it almost the sole focus point. I guess Tesla understood that as their SuC and DeC network grew large enough, they could reduce it in size and just leave it in a corner, as to not draw so much attention to it. Not that it’s not necessary info, but likelyhood of running out of juice was very low.I guess I'm going through what most new EV owners do... staring at that range meter all the time. (...)
I did order the CHAdeMO adapter... (...)
hope that they do come out with a CCS adapter... even though it seems that a CCS adapter is not in the cards.)
Still would not want to primarily rely on DC fast charging of course since that can do a number on your battery, too, I know. But still it would be nice to have more options since with EVs right now -- "it's not the odds, it's the stakes".
CHAdeMO was also on my shopping list, but in the end, the SuC and public level 2 network is plenty for me.
It is quite an expensive piece. But depends on CHAdeMO network around your trips.
Tesla has confirmed they will propose a CCS adapter. Tesla confirms Model 3 is getting a CCS plug in Europe, adapter coming for Model S and Model X
From reading TMC and understanding various charging patterns, I’m convinced SuC only might have a very small negative impact, but only on the very long run. There used to be indeed 90 batteries being limited in SuC charging speed, but I have not read any such thing for the newest 75 and 100. (Nor for the 70 or 85 btw).