Yes, I do. The thermal breakdown temperature of the LEAF chemistry is much more favorable for avoiding thermal runaway.
I'm not entirely sure that a few screwdriver punctures to one cell removed from the pack enclosure equates equally to something the size of a trailer hitch impaling an entire group of cells while they are still densely packed in to the enclosure.
Ditto for the torch. Do we now for a fact that scorching the outside of some Tesla cells for a few seconds at a time has a different result?
I'm not stating the results would certainly be different, but without similar testing under like circumstances I don't see how that video supports your assertion.
Perhaps I am using the wrong terminology, but my understanding is that the Tesla runs a coolant pump to equalize the cell temperatures, and also heating/ac to maintain battery temperatures within certain parameters, even when the car is parked, which is why you are advised to not leave the car unplugged for extended periods for fear of draining the pack. This is what I was referring to.
The active thermal management (pumps, etc...) for the Model S hasn't been observed to run while the car is parked under even very hot or cold conditions, at least that I am aware of, but only while either driving or during charging sessions, specifically superchargers.
If the car is powered down when parked, it will last for times similar to what you state for the Leaf, I believe. If you don't power it down, there can be some parasitic draw form the on-board systems... but even then if the car finally gets to a point wher eit needs to preserve the pack it will auto-shut down where it can hibernate for months without the pack being damaged.
As the issue is load presented by the car's systems, and not the pack depleting itself, the issue would be the same regardless of if it were battery chemistry similar to the Leaf's, no?