You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it generally thought the AWD version will be LR with the interior upgrades? Or will there be any choice other than RW vs AWD?
Is it generally thought the AWD version will be LR with the interior upgrades? Or will there be any choice other than RW vs AWD?
They might even prioritize the Performance model first given its higher margins.General thought is that Tesla will prioritize the most profitable available version and won't be able to produce the lower spec versions until they've ramped up and improved margins.
So when AWD arrives it'll be LR AWD + PUP, possibly also with air suspension required.
They might even prioritize the Performance model first given its higher margins.
Source?Nope, Elon already dismissed performance version as "maybe middle of 2019".
Actually Elon quote you are referring, was back in the summer of 2017, that he said, middle of next year! So that would be summer of 2018!Source?
Source?
Looks like he last mentioned this on twitter last year but was referencing 2018.
However with the nearly six month schedule slide it doesn't seem too likely (to me) that the performance version will arrive this year. Keep in mind that SR version will now be delayed by nearly a year from original estimates and AWD version that was supposed top start shipping at the end of 2017 won't be shipping until late this year.
So, giant lumps of salt for everyone on any unrealistic expectations.
tesla-model-3-performance-elon-musk
Looks like he last mentioned this on twitter last year but was referencing 2018.
However with the nearly six month schedule slide it doesn't seem too likely (to me) that the performance version will arrive this year. Keep in mind that SR version will now be delayed by nearly a year from original estimates and AWD version that was supposed top start shipping at the end of 2017 won't be shipping until late this year.
So, giant lumps of salt for everyone on any unrealistic expectations.
tesla-model-3-performance-elon-musk
There's precedence for the Performance 3 being delivered first. Tesla already did this once when they introduced the P85D. Also if you don't have the time to automate the steps for the new line and require more manual labor for the dual motor AWD versions, it makes sense to start the manufacturing process with the higher margin car so you don't skew your margins
From Tesla Model S - Wikipedia:
On October 9, 2014, Tesla announced the introduction of All-Wheel Drive (AWD) versions of the Model S's 60, 85, and P85 models, designated by a D at the end of the model number.[82][83][84]
...
Deliveries of the P85D started in December 2014, with the 85D models starting in February 2015, and the 70D models starting in April 2015.[83]
We'll see but my money is on dual motor (possibly with forced air suspension) arriving before a performance model does.
The take rate on a $5K option like dual motor is going to be a LOT higher than on a performance version that probably carries a $10K if not $15K premium.
We don't know what "performance" entails on the Model 3 though. If the difference between AWD and Performance is only software, aka an "uncorking", they'd be crazy to not offer it up right away. That's a high margin config if you can add another $7500-$10K with just software.
It is highly unlikely it is just software, but sure, it's possible.
Do you really think the performance version is going to have the same brakes that the regular LR version has? The brakes that didn't hold up to 6 laps at Seca without requiring the owner get the car towed to the shop for a $3,000 repair?
I kind of doubt it.
In the Model S, if memory serves, there are physical differences as well including a different ceramic fuse or current limiter that allows more power to flow from the battery to the drive motors.
It really comes down to what Tesla is after. If they are just looking to shave 1 second off the 0-60 time then sure, I agree, can probably be done with software.
If it's to better compete with cars like the BMW M3, then just having a similar 0-60 time is not going to cut it. At $60K the BMW M3 is a track weapon with very high performance brakes and a track tuned suspension. If that's the target Tesla has for their $60K-$70K Performance version of the model 3 I imagine that they want to produce a car that is similar in price to a BMW M3 or Audi RS4 but will absolutely destroy those cars on the race track.
My source for this hunch is Musk's ego.