Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Russia/Ukraine conflict

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Both your Yugoslav and Ukranian history is grossly oversimplified, especially the Ukranian one.

Yes, Croatia had a puppet Nazi regime, and it was extremely brutal, but this one was never voted in (had about 1% support in 1939), and there was a huge anti Nazi partisan movement in Croatia (Tito for example was Croatian). Yes, a lot of Serbians were in the partisans, but they also had an imposed puppet Nazi regime, and the Serbian chetniks were all over the place in the alliances, depending on opportunity - with/against Germans, Italians, allies etc.

Yes, there was some pro Nazi movement in Ukraine, but the bulk by far was anti Nazi- (some of the) the most ferocious fight against Germany was in Ukraine, by the Ukranians. And the pro Nazi movement can to a huge degree be explained by their very justified hatred of Stalin - if Germany was not hell bent on killing off (or enslaving) the entire East European population (instead of just defeating them militarily), the Soviet Union would have fallen easily in 1941 (from the 2nd half of 1942 the Soviet Union got its *sugar* together regarding military tactics, weapons production, officer corps, etc but till then it was a complete incompetent clusterfuck).

Anyway, this is just a historic clarification, and completely irrelevant to what is happening today - invading another country is never justified, killing civilians is never justified, Putin is a war criminal.

When Germany in invaded in 1941, the Germans were seen as liberators. Stalin caused one of the worst famines in history in Ukraine in the 1930s. When the Ukrainians figured out the Germans were worse, they threw their lot in with the Russians and conducted one of the largest insurgencies of WW II.

What's the problem?

Why can't the US, France or the UK protect the Slovakian airspace and also provide the Air Power necessary if the countries with the MIGs give them to Ukraine?

Most countries don't want to depend on a foreign power to completely defend their airspace. National pride plays a role here.

Update from Mearsheimer in today's New Yorker - (see also this piece on Ukraine's mis step

BTW I prefer to know all relevant facts and opinions, those contradicting my prior beliefs I find more useful as they are potentially an opportunity to learn something new, the opposite of the echo chamber effect which is the current 'brainwashing" happening all over the world, now especially in the US. As Elon said in that vein, if you're not making mistakes, you're not growing/ improving ; D

View attachment 775791

The US does not completely have clean hands, but the eastern European countries were clamoring to join NATO from the moment the USSR fell apart. The expansion of NATO has been a balancing act between the desires of Russia and Eastern Europe.
 
When Germany in invaded in 1941, the Germans were seen as liberators. Stalin caused one of the worst famines in history in Ukraine in the 1930s. When the Ukrainians figured out the Germans were worse, they threw their lot in with the Russians and conducted one of the largest insurgencies of WW II.
Thinking more about the mud/trees.

It is a problem this time of year because there is a lot of mud and the trees are bare...

I imagine in summer, the trees will provide a lot more cover and the ground will be drier..

That is in addition to any insurgency opportunities in cities, under bridges, etc.
 
We need an anti-air missile system that's more visual. Flares appear to be SUPER effective...


A visual SAM system would miss most of the time. Jets are hard to hit with manual aim. Flares and chaff to distract missiles have been around almost as long as guided missiles have been around.

Anyone else think that stalled military convey might be a chance for the Russian soldiers to enter the Guinness Book of Records and military folklore by being part of the biggest surrender in military history. Even if not in terms of military personnel, certainly in terms of military equipment.

5 Million Rubbles is a fair delivery fee, and it will be the easiest 5 Million most of them ever make.

If they are genuinely out of fuel and food, then they don't have a lot of options...

Even if they have plenty of fuel and food, they will eventually run out of food unless they get regular resupply.

Ukraine recently counter attacked in that area, they first time they have reclaimed territory on a hopefully permanent basis.

IMO there are 4 likely reasons for that:-
1. Making sure the Russians stay put.
2. Establishing forward bases for Drone strikes on the convoy.
3. As part of a series of moves designed to cut-off resupply.
4. All of the above.

Meantime the Kyiv air defence is holding up well, any cease fire might be an opportunity to improve the air defence of other cities.

We will Russians be slightly more accommodating at the next round of talks, or will their troops get to set the record?

The Russian army today is nowhere near large enough to have the largest surrender in history. I think that goes to the first Battle of Kiev in 1941 when around 650,000 Soviet troops ended up surrendering after being encircled and starved out.

Here's another similar article that has been used a lot by people defending Russia's actions, especially Chinese language ones (not sure if the links to Chinese translations was the cause or were added afterwards).
Opinion | This Is Putin’s War. But America and NATO Aren’t Innocent Bystanders.

This "US/NATO started this war" argument typically is presented by people in other countries not directly in the midst of it and seem to never consider nor care what the people of Eastern Europe wanted. They also fail to see the irony that Russia's military actions in Eastern Europe over the years and this ongoing invasion is exactly what those people feared and why they wanted to join NATO.

The reality is, if you pay attention to what Putin have said in his speeches throughout the years about the dissolution of the USSR, and also his actual essay in 2021 on the subject of Ukraine (many of the points which he can easily recycle to "justify" invading other Eastern European countries), NATO and threat to Russia's existing borders have nothing to do with it. It's imperialism plain and simple. Even without NATO's east expansion, as long as there are eastern European nations that are unwilling to be Putin's puppets, there is no guarantee he won't invade.

Blaming the US for this situation is like laying the complete blame for Pearl Harbor on the US embargo of oil to Japan. That embargo led the Japanese to attack the US so they could capture the oil in the Dutch East Indies without the US interfering.

In the days after Pearl Harbor the criticisms of US foreign policy evaporated.


The mud this time of year in that region is epic. To anyone who hasn't experienced Russian/Ukrainian/Belarusian spring mud, it's hard to comprehend just how crazy the mud is in the region. It's the worst spring thaw in the world.
 
so the twitter pic of the APC and 2 t80 tanks stuck in mud. Very nice to see my Ukrainian friends building a corduroy road, a road made of logs (famously used by sherman moving through SC during US Civil War, and by loggers everywhere). Hope they get them out and back on dry ground and fighting.

Yes the mud is epic and will favor the defense. Armor will be stuck on roads. I thought all along that Putin had waited too long
 
Thinking more about the mud/trees.

It is a problem this time of year because there is a lot of mud and the trees are bare...

I imagine in summer, the trees will provide a lot more cover and the ground will be drier..

That is in addition to any insurgency opportunities in cities, under bridges, etc.

There is a reason nobody moved in the war in the east in the fall and spring in WW II. From late spring to early fall, the Germans were on the offensive in 1941 and 1942. They tried an offensive when the weather cleared in 1943 (Kursk), but the Russians had gotten too strong at that point.

The Russians owned the winter. Frozen ground is great for tanks and they knew how to keep their troops warm.

Launching this invasion right after the spring thaw is the height of hubris. I'm sure Putin knew the trouble his army was going to face and his generals definitely knew. Western Russia is the same terrain as northern Ukraine with the same spring conditions. The Russian army has engineering units trained to partially deal with the muddy conditions, but there is only so much they can do. It's obvious trying to move almost the entire army at once is way too much for their engineering corps to handle.

This winter never had a hard freeze which worked against the Russians. The original plan was probably to launch while the ground was frozen, but they waited too long.

BTW, I found this Twitter feed for all the Russian weapons that have been found around Ukraine. There are some Ukrainian losses too, but most of it is Russian.
https://twitter.com/UAWeapons
 
1646283013478.png


I assume the drop in the ruble, shutdown of factories, loss of imports etc will start to hurt the average Russian a lot soon.
 
Last edited:
The US does not completely have clean hands, but the eastern European countries were clamoring to join NATO from the moment the USSR fell apart. The expansion of NATO has been a balancing act between the desires of Russia and Eastern Europe.
As a citizen of one of these Eastern European countries, I can attest to that. A huge majority wanted to get into both NATO and the EU as soon as possible. A wise choice.