I agree that feedback is good, in general... but in these cases many times these are new features that we did not even know we were getting, and rather than saying " this feature is cool but it would be better if...." what I read most times is "WTF were they thinking when they released this?!?!? it should do XXXX. Whoever designed this should be fired!"
There is likely some reason or other that we are not privy to that made tesla hard code in 6am as the stop charging time. There is likely some variable that we are unaware of. Even if thats so, I would rather them release these features rather than hold onto them until they think they are "perfect" so to speak.
I actually haven't seen too much all-caps belly-aching/screaming about this feature, and nobody so far is advocating for termination of anybody over it, but I do understand that in forums anybody can say what they want, so people tend to express themselves in perhaps less tactful ways than they (hopefully) would in-person. Doesn't seem to have happened that way for this feature, but sure we've all seen the rantings and ravings that can occur on the internets.
And of course, I'm simply not using this new feature because it particularly doesn't work for me (and not for all of Tesla's EV owners in Northern California, BTW - all on EV2-A now - including the Tesla Factory).
I'd rather we get nifty features, too, even if not "perfect," so long as they are still broadly useable (which this feature, by and large is not, in its current state, and certainly not in half of Tesla's home state.).
But . . . . now we're splitting hairs as to when is something truly minimally viable. It's a judgment call, and not a bright line.
I'd call that line somewhere *after* they figure out how to make the charging time variable (which, really, really, I doubt it's that tough to, software-wise. But again, we don't know for certain, so who knows.)