You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The obvious answer is that they have nothing to say on this because Tesla's version is the truth (and perhaps Tesla has these demands from Mobileye in writing). I have to say it is just plain stupid to pick a fight that can't be won.
Sorry; I'm not savvy with marking up and posting charts so I'll describe as best I can. I'm looking at the 5 minute chart for today. If you check the first 5 candles (i.e. first 25 mins of trading) we see the price trying to push below 199, but each candle closed above this level, creating long lines beneath the candles called shadows. This indicates buying pressure - every drop in price was being met by immediate buy up. It's not a bulletproof way of knowing the SP will increase in the short term, but when there's no shares left to short there's a good chance the buying pressure will prevail and the SP will shoot up (as it has right now).Could you please post the corresponding chart?
Thanks in advance!
I just hope it's over with this exchange. I don't think this public spat is a good look for either one of them (TSLA, MBLY) at the moment.
Time will tell who was right.
I think it was great it came out. It was an indirect way of saying Tesla is never satisfied with the status quo, and they take time and effort to develop products, not just release...I just hope it's over with this exchange. I don't think this public spat is a good look for either one of them (TSLA, MBLY) at the moment.
Time will tell who was right.
Holt's company is also backed by one of the largest/smartest VC firms in Silicon Valley (Andreesen Horowitz).If you look at Hotzs talk at TC recently, he clearly stated that it's a team effort and a year long project. His approach is similar to Musks. He thinks by the end of next year, his solution will cover 90% of time spent in car. All he is saying is that it is a data driven approach and a software solution.
Sorry; I'm not savvy with marking up and posting charts so I'll describe as best I can. I'm looking at the 5 minute chart for today. If you check the first 5 candles (i.e. first 25 mins of trading) we see the price trying to push below 199, but each candle closed above this level, creating long lines beneath the candles called shadows. This indicates buying pressure - every drop in price was being met by immediate buy up. It's not a bulletproof way of knowing the SP will increase in the short term, but when there's no shares left to short there's a good chance the buying pressure will prevail and the SP will shoot up (as it has right now).
I am wondering if there is below the counter market for TSLA share lending. With all the mm of recalled shares we should have seen much more buying pressure and higher volumes, unless recalled shares are replaced with new borrows that are directly negotiated and therefore not visible by observing the shares available for shorting at various Brokerages.
I think the shorts are just not responding yet to the recall pressure -- they believe TSLA will continue to fall and the buy-in won't hurt them. Many shorts may be so far in the money that it's a worthwhile gamble.
There is always below-the-counter borrowing, but there shouldn't be that many shares available to borrow. Most institutions -- even if they haven't recalled quite yet -- should at least have turned off lending on TSLA. I think we're seeing that in public shares available and recently rising rebate rates.
Most retail customers likely aren't holding these securities in margin accounts -- though that's unclear (e.g., I have a margin account and at least some of TSLA shares are likely still on loan). So retail's approximately 25 million shares aren't available.
What do we actually know as fact? There are few to no shares available to borrow, rebate rates have recently risen and there's very low volume.
Occam's razor time: the simplest explanation is that lenders have stopped lending, shorts aren't covering because they don't want to bid up the price and sellers aren't selling at this level.
I think we will see some very interesting price action (despite macro market activity) through the course of today and Monday.
I think the shorts are just not responding yet to the recall pressure -- they believe TSLA will continue to fall and the buy-in won't hurt them. Many shorts may be so far in the money that it's a worthwhile gamble.
There is always below-the-counter borrowing, but there shouldn't be that many shares available to borrow. Most institutions -- even if they haven't recalled quite yet -- should at least have turned off lending on TSLA. I think we're seeing that in public shares available and recently rising rebate rates.
Most retail customers likely aren't holding these securities in margin accounts -- though that's unclear (e.g., I have a margin account and at least some of TSLA shares are likely still on loan). So retail's approximately 25 million shares aren't available.
What do we actually know as fact? There are few to no shares available to borrow, rebate rates have recently risen and there's very low volume.
Occam's razor time: the simplest explanation is that lenders have stopped lending, shorts aren't covering because they don't want to bid up the price and sellers aren't selling at this level.
I think we will see some very interesting price action (despite macro market activity) through the course of today and Monday.
EDIT: I didn't realize the price action was happening as I was writing this post. That's a pretty big jump on very low volume -- maybe the weaker (less in-the-money) shorts are starting to cover.
[....]
IMO, Elon did not want SCTY to be a further embarrassment, and the easiest solution was to swallow the whole enchilada. Listening to or reading the transcript of SCTY's 1Q16 conference call is instructive.
I wouldn't be surprised if there's a growing sentiment among institutional investors (many of whom are invested in TSLA) that TSLA would be better off with someone else at the CEO helm and Elon doing more product/vision stuff. The Elon Halo has evolved... it's no longer that Elon is infallible... it's more like Elon is great in many ways but not all.Here is how I think about the odds of the merger passing: If you are investing in SCTY and/or TSLA you have to understand that a lot of the valuation is goodwill associated with future plans and Elon Halo. Like it or not, Elon's mere presence is providing the confidence for very high multiples. So the same logic that as you investing in these companies means you are in part investing in Elon. He wants the merger. He says it's smart and necessary. So what is your logic in holding these companies and voting down the merger? You are saying we believe in your sweeping vision, but at the same time we don't like your sweeping vision. Keep doing what you were doing but we are going to stymie your big policy initiative. I don't buy it.
This Electrek article is old but it has the straw poll numbers too:
Elon Musk now convinced Tesla-SolarCity merger will pass after talking to major investors