-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
Gerardf
Active Member
New document. Amendment to form S-4.
Tesla Motors - Registration Statement
Edit: as expected: no change in the SCTY / TSLA exchange ratio. (Page 12 / 117)
If the Merger is completed, SolarCity stockholders will receive 0.110 shares of Tesla Common Stock for each share of SolarCity Common Stock they hold, with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares. The Exchange Ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted for changes in the market value of the common stock of SolarCity or Tesla.
Tesla Motors - Registration Statement
Edit: as expected: no change in the SCTY / TSLA exchange ratio. (Page 12 / 117)
If the Merger is completed, SolarCity stockholders will receive 0.110 shares of Tesla Common Stock for each share of SolarCity Common Stock they hold, with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares. The Exchange Ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted for changes in the market value of the common stock of SolarCity or Tesla.
Last edited:
And record date in amended S-4 is still a blank, so it is not set yet.
Paging @esk8mw: would you expect the record date, if it is indeed going to be sometime this week, not to be known on Monday, or this might be an indication that record date will likely be pushed back a week or two?
Paging @esk8mw: would you expect the record date, if it is indeed going to be sometime this week, not to be known on Monday, or this might be an indication that record date will likely be pushed back a week or two?
Hogfighter
Professional Lurker
This PT was made before the 400,000 deposits for Model 3. Everything changed after that. Prior, TSLA was concentrating on the X as well as FCF positive. Then the timeline moved up 2 years for both the 3 and the GF, which blew the whole FCF positive thing out of the water.
Long term, the deposits are great news. Short term it totally screwed us.
Check your timeline again. She had a price target of $355 and raised it to $500 only after the reveal of the Model 3 and subsequent blowout reservations. In a way, the fact that high profile analysts can get it wrong too (bulls and bears alike) shows us that whatever extra information they get from management is not really material.
This is one year PT set in April of this year. I don't think you can state that she was wrong before April of next year.
MitchJi
Trying to learn kindness, patience & forgiveness
Wow!
Analysts price targets are often incorrect and that proves that any additional information they get from management isn't material? You should be an analyst because following your logic you'd be able to make 100% correct predictions.
This is one year PT set in April of this year. I don't think you can state that she was wrong before April of next year.
How about her $355 target?
BRIEF-Four lawsuits filed by purported stockholders of Tesla challenging SolarCity deal
* Between Sept 1 and Sept 14, four lawsuits filed in court of Chancery of State of Delaware by purported stockholders of Tesla challenging SolarCity deal
* Tesla says if any of four lawsuits not resolved, it could prevent or delay completion of the merger Source text for Eikon: Further company coverage:
* Between Sept 1 and Sept 14, four lawsuits filed in court of Chancery of State of Delaware by purported stockholders of Tesla challenging SolarCity deal
* Tesla says if any of four lawsuits not resolved, it could prevent or delay completion of the merger Source text for Eikon: Further company coverage:
The $355 target was based on projected sales of 500,000 vehicles in 2020 (before Model 3 reveal) plus a modest contribution from TE.
The simplest and IMO most reasonable conclusion is that the market has not yet priced in sales of 500,000 vehicles in 2020, plus a modest contribution from TE.
Which, IMO, means the market is being totally irrational.
racer26
Active Member
Anybody know anything about these 4 alleged lawsuits? In particular if there's any substance to them?
M&A's frequently generate lawsuits that are total hogwash. So far as any of us have been able to tell, TSLA/SCTY have both been completely above board with how they've handled it.
I personally will not hold it against her if her $500 PT will materialize...
Seriously, though, this, of course, does not prove anything. I am really surprised that you are making this argument.
MitchJi
Trying to learn kindness, patience & forgiveness
No, I'm stating it's a well known fact that analysts and large institutional investors are given access to information that the public doesn't.
I'm not an attorney so I have no idea of weather or not these standard industry practices violate SEC rules.
Do you get a private callback from Tesla IR after the CC's to have your questions answered? What do you think they talk about?
They are adding COLOR to what was said during the ER call. Analysts never have enough COLOR, always need and ask for more.
Last edited:
TrendTrader007
Active Member
Just put in order to buy another 1000+ shares TSLA at open
This is one year PT set in April of this year. I don't think you can state that she was wrong before April of next year.
ev-enthusiast posted her analysis from June 15, 2015
"ev-enthusiast, Tuesday at 4:49 PM
http://andreajames.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/fd0d1ff7-dcb4-4000-9254-cd7b1b2b7c3a.pdf
Nice read."
Her predictions for the last four quarters were a bit off;
_________Dougherty________Actual
_____EPS___Av Shares____EPS___Av Shares
3Q15---+$0.31----126.4MM___($0.58)___129.0MM
4Q15__+$0.95----126.4MM___($0.87)___131.1MM
1Q16__+$0.61---126.4MM___($0.57)___132.7MM
2Q16__+$0.77---126.4MM___($1.06)___140.0MM
Probably the call back did not help her in anticipating problems with the Model X.
Interesting two of the suits are from institutions
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
