Agree, tesla will then be the presidential limoTrump's a simple headed man. He just needs to take a tour of the gigafactory, get a test drive and he'll be hooked.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree, tesla will then be the presidential limoTrump's a simple headed man. He just needs to take a tour of the gigafactory, get a test drive and he'll be hooked.
How is that possible? Shorts selling to shorts?. In fact, the chart shows days when trading by shorts exceeds the trading by longs of TSLA.
I could be wrong but I think that contract is already filled.Agree, tesla will then be the presidential limo
I agree with everything you said ballast makes no sense at all for any reason.There's no way a 1600-1700 kg rack would be significantly unstable. I work with heavy racks, and they aren't at all unstable unless they have *a lot* of weight at the top. On the PP the weight will be fairly evenly distributed, as you can see the modules are evenly distributed across the height. You could probably drive into a PP with a truck at 10 mph and it would still be standing. The biggest issue with instability would be the ground/floor caving in under it, and there's no way ballast would help with that. Also, the PP1 will be more stable than the PP2, as it is wider, so if one of the versions needed ballast, it would be the PP2.
I think my guesstimates probably aren't far from the truth:
Being in New York, you have NO CLUE what the average, blue-collar workers in small-town Georgia, Alabama, and all the other states that went to Trump are thinking. I live among them.
UPDATE: Global Equities Research’s Chowdhry isn’t the only analyst taking a constructive view of Tesla. Baird’s Ben Kallo and Tyler Frank argue that Tesla is “relatively insulated from the effects of a Republican win.”
Tesla share price might win, but their mission loses:A bit of a catch 22 for big auto, if they change the rules, then there's little urgency to shift towards EVs, either way, Tesla wins.
Tesla’s mission is to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.
Admittedly, I didn't think about earthquakes. (I don't have much experience with that.) But a few bolts should help with the PP sliding back and forth.I agree with everything you said except for earthquakes.
hahaha, thanks for sharing.
"technology and change are swamping the regulatory capacity to manage our emerging reality. Reform is imperative."
How is that possible? Shorts selling to shorts?
They also said:Trade group urges Trump to revise auto emissions rules
hahaha, thanks for sharing.
So this part right here really means "Guys, we're ****ed and we can't stop it."
Never in my life has there been weak demand for electric vehicles. Most of my life, however, there has been weak supply. That supply got stronger with Tesla, which can't keep up with demand for a half luxury car at luxury price. But soon, they will have an electric vehicle at just over half that price (base vs. base), and that demand will start to be met more.weak demand for electric vehicles
That means that Tesla should do a better job of educating owners. It should be easy to get the number up to very close to 1000%.Sometimes 2% makes all the difference
(Tesla did a survey that showed 98% of owners understand that "Autopilot" means you still have to maintain control of the vehicle at all times)
I've yet to see any weak demand.
Enough of all this hippie elite nonsense. This is God's will people. God sent Trump to make coal great again!
Trump May ‘Dig’ Coal, But Industry’s Outlook Is Flat at Best