Chartered321
Member
We all know this is the way Goldman buys stocks for itself right?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GS was pissed off about SCTY too... and they made an open statement about what they believed as missing details during the last cap raise. GS dumped 50% of their position in Q2. they are probably now 100% out.OK, so it would make sense that both Goldman and Morgan Stanley hate Tesla now, correct? Remember, back in May, Goldman upgraded Tesla the same day GS & Morgan Stanley announced they are leading the $2B offering. Right after this, Tesla announced their plans to acquire SCTY, which pissed off Adam Jonas of MS and he reduced his target to $245 from something a lot higher.
Realistically, if just about all analysts are expecting GAAP profitability, including GS on the high end.. I'm starting to question how much Q3 ER will really help the stock. Ugh. Not the time to make jokes, but maybe Elon's the pie in the face of Wall St comment (was that e-mail meant to be leaked by Musk?) pissed them off a bit.
GS was pissed off about SCTY too... and they made an open statement about what they believed as missing details during the last cap raise. GS dumped 50% of their position in Q2. they are probably now 100% out.
OK, so it would make sense that both Goldman and Morgan Stanley hate Tesla now, correct? Remember, back in May, Goldman upgraded Tesla the same day GS & Morgan Stanley announced they are leading the $2B offering. Right after this, Tesla announced their plans to acquire SCTY, which pissed off Adam Jonas of MS and he reduced his target to $245 from something a lot higher.
Realistically, if just about all analysts are expecting GAAP profitability, including GS on the high end.. I'm starting to question how much Q3 ER will really help the stock. Ugh. Not the time to make jokes, but maybe Elon's the pie in the face of Wall St comment (was that e-mail meant to be leaked by Musk?) pissed them off a bit.
EDIT: Man, when I saw these two tweets from Elon, I had a funny feeling something might be bothering him. Could have been this.
if the 10x ramp were to occur as you've described... then we should start to see headlines of such by mid Q4 regarding deals made for Q1 deliveries in the range of 500MWh to 850MWh... yes/no?
You are amazing. I described 5x ramp. Urge to twist everything around is an indication that you are trolling... yes / no?
guys... this is an ugly week for TSLA... sorry for your losses... but it may be time to be mentally prepared for very significant declines from here. sounds all doom and gloomy... but there is a clearer path than ever back to $100 from here. I guess I'm writing this here since over the last few weeks I've interacted with way more people that I would have expected with 100% confidence... there's only one [short term] positive catalyst in the near future and it's a positive ER which was essentially just rejected this week... you should be prepared to lose 25% to 50% in the short term.
wow man... this was a simple question... and you take it to "trolling"?... in basically the same sentence you have 10x and 5x... yeah... an oversight in my question... but it remained the same question regardless... just at 5%... damn.You are amazing. I described 5x ramp. Urge to twist everything around is an indication that you are trolling... yes / no?
Yes it is. So are the risks of it not happening. You gotta remember, people hate losing money much more than they like making money. Yes the happy scenario has big payoffs but the unhappy one makes for big losses.
Please, check your nomenclature. Tesla is not just an auto company anymore.
Also, due to the current monetary policy, there's a whole lot of crazy money out there chasing the piddly returns that are available. This is a chance to go big, so cash supply is abundant.
Yes this Elon Musk Follows Zero Women on Twitter (Updated)EDIT: Man, when I saw these two tweets from Elon, I had a funny feeling something might be bothering him. He was all chipper before delivery announcement. I just attributed his slight crankiness to an unsustained move.
in your chart you're giving a little bit of leeway on the top and bottom... it could be that 202 is touching the bottom trendline there and the current support is attempting to stop it from breaking down.Interesting action in pre-market. The volume is less than I would expect for a significant downgrade, with a clear support at around $202 - $203.
I think that if we can stay today within the blue triangle (stay above $200), there is a fair chance of a bounce and a break-out. This downgrade feels very fishy. Let's see how successful GS is at scraping drying cream from their faces...
View attachment 197649
Here is my napkin math on the subject.
There are two large TE projects that supposed to be completed this year and I expect them to be booked in Q4: 80MWh for Southern California Edison Mira Loma substation and 56MWh for Kauai dispatchable solar project. Assuming that large projects like that are responsible for 80% of the volume (based on Elon remarks), let's say that total Q4 TE would amount for 136 MWh / 0.8 = 170 MWh.
So going forward, if there will be no growth and TE will just able to maintain current sales, we can expect at least 4 x 170 MWh = 0.68 GWh in 2017. In reality the TE sales will most definitely scale up, the question is by how much. I am fully aware of the dangers of following what Elon said about this growth, but really think that he was off by much with timing only, perhaps not with the scaling part of it. He and JB on several occasions mentioned 10x annual growth. If we discount this by a factor of 2, the total 2017 TE sales would be 5 x 0.68 = 3.4GWh.
In terms of the gross profit, assuming that average price per kWh is discounted 10% from the list price of $445/kWh (and ignoring revenue from inverters as there is little visibility of gross margins), and further conservatively assuming cost to be 1.25 x $190/kWh = $238/kWh (25% premium over TA batteries, no savings due to GF) the gross profit would be 0.9 x $445/kWh - $238/kWh = $162/kWh.
So I think that conservatively we could expect TE bringing $3.4GWh x $162/kWh = $550MM in 2017. The upside is about double of this if 10x growth mentioned by Elon and JB will pan out.
All in all I expect TE contributing about $500MM of gross profit in 2017.
EDIT: I believe that we will get 2017 TE guidance during the Q42016 ER.
Goldman Sachs has a horrible track record when it comes to Tesla. Huge buying opportunity IMHO.
In light of GS announcement that they expect a rather substantial GAAP profit for the 3Q in spite of this downgrade, it seems to me that they are removing some of the positive effect of such a profit on the SP. That is no longer a beat of expectations but rather a meet. In reality, did the analysts previously expect a profit at this point? I didn't think they did. If not, it actually is a beat but expectations are being redesigned now that it is looking likely that Q3 will be a profitable quarter so that it is just expected. This should reduce or eliminate a positive market reaction to the Q3 ER. Why would they do this other than to manipulate the SP? Could someone that knows the GS history with Tesla briefly explain their investments in Tesla? I thought they were a big investor with the company that has an interest in seeing it take off. Is that correct? If so, then as Chartered just said, this would be a move designed to lower the SP only in the short term for more buying on the cheaper side for them/their investors? Apparently there is some friction between Musk and GS as well as MS but doesn't money always matter more, especially to financial institutions?? I'm a long term investor in TSLA but I think this analysis is important in determining whether to add shares for the short term. Do we need to revise our expectations about the SP for the next few months?