For those who don't know, Arizona is also trying to repeal net metering.
Also, Arizona just passed a law that allows utilities to charge you and extra fee for having solar; $5/month.
Arizona is the second biggest solar state in the US.
Strike 1 - $60 annual fee for using solar
Strike 2 - Avg. $152 annual increase in property taxes
Strike 3?
Strike 3 is if net metering goes away. If that happens then you bet that people will be breaking lease contracts because solar is losing them money every month, and a lot of it. Without net metering, rooftop solar is not economical.
Battery storage would be great if it was free, but it is expensive. So if you have to pay another $40/month or more for battery storage on top of those fees then solar is not economical at all, unless you go completely off the grid; but then you need a bigger battery.
My average size solar system at 7.68kW produced 46kWh's today and 30 of those were sent to the grid. So those 8kW batteries that SCTY is offering/testing right now for ~$10 - $20 per month are worthless for me, and for most other people as well. I would need at least a 20-30kW battery, but then it starts getting expensive.
If this new tax gets implemented on solar leases after imposing a new $5 fee and net metering does go away in Arizona, then I am fairly certain that at least a few (if not a lot) of people will be cancelling or re-negotiating (doubtful) their contracts with SCTY. And that is another risk for ABS holders, which are only triple B rated for a reason.
Once again, I am not short SCTY. I think that the company will be very successful. Just playing devil's advocate in this thread, because I know that a lot of people appreciate hearing the other side of the story too.