Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Wiki SpaceX as a Company - General Discussion

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Well, the current testing of Super Heavy is certainly agonizingly slow.
IMO it is proceeding rapidly. As an example, it takes many months for NASA to install just 4 engines on the SLS core stage (they are doing it now, incredibly slowly). In contrast, SpaceX can install 33 Raptors on a Super Heavy in a matter of days.

Another example; after FTS-1 the base of the launch pad area was heavily damaged, as you know. It was completely repaired in just a few months and a completely new system for flame diversion, the water deluge system, was installed and tested successfully.

Slow? I don’t think so.
 

Not quite a total victory:

"At the same time, SpaceX had filed a lawsuit in September, claiming that the administrative case against them violated the US Constitution. The recent court order blocks the Justice Department’s case until the resolution of SpaceX’s constitutional challenge."

Still, nice to see.
 
One wonders just what Justice was thinking when they filed that suit…

They were concerned SpaceX was violating labor laws. 0th order, one could interpret SX rejecting asylees and refugees as discrimination. (And after the fact, 0th order, its not the best look that the one asylee they hired was after DOJ started investigating.)

SX's "we're only going to hire US persons because we build rockets and so there's ITAR and stuff" isn't airtight, as every other space industry company in the US employs foreign nationals because not every position within a company falls under controlled categories. Compartmentalization of open technology vs EAR vs ITAR within a company is a well solved problem; SX has this compartmentalization implemented because...they need to anyway.

So then the question is why were these specific people rejected? If it was merit based, (or even, was the position recently filled with someone already?) no problem.

FWIW it wouldn't be a surprise if SX was indeed misinterpreting export control law relative to hiring (in other words, not in a maliciously discriminatory way, as I suspect some folks are assuming is the accusation). The space industry has historically been WAY conservative with controlled tech and SX is no different. It’s far easier to just put the ITAR stamp on the document template than actually evaluate the content within every document before stamping; it’s easy to imagine porting that approach over to hiring.

Anyway, What we're likely talking about here are pretty low level jobs. Stuff that's a step above contracted services (janitorial, etc.) but not deeply technical. Is it some weirdo trying to make a buck? Maybe. Could that weirdo actually have a case? Also maybe.

While of course playing the slippery slope card can often itself be a slippery slope, there's a) potential precedent that's being set regarding hiring discrimination (that could extend beyond the presumably infinitesimal asylee/refugee pool) and b) potential that malicious discrimination rejection is being masked. (Eg, are you round-filing that CV because the person isn't a US person or is it really because they're Muslim?).



It's certainly easy to make an uniformed broad brush of "SpaceX Haters Gonna Hate" on this one; reality is not quite so binary.
 
I can’t think it being anything other than butthurt partisans who don’t like Musk. Our government really is out of control.
It can also be that many other companies have similar suits against them and we just don't hear about them. They aren't going to make it in the media because no one would care. SpaceX, like Tesla, gets media coverage on anything and everything that happens to them. Since SpaceX and Tesla is "in the spotlight" then it can feel like they are being picked on when they might really be amongst the crowd of businesses being investigated and sued.
 
Last edited:
SpaceX was incredible in 2022. Now we know they were significantly dominant in 2023. They easily launched more than the rest of the world combined with 1238 tonnes of mass to orbit. They didn't quite hit the 100 launches they were shooting for but succeeded with 91 F9's, 5 FH's, and 2 suborbital test flights of Starship. 4 new boosters were brought into the fleet, while 5 FH center cores were expended as well as two side boosters and two full Starship stacks during their test launches. Historic B1058 achieved a milestone 19 launches and landings before being destroyed by weather.

Further they achieved breakeven threshold on Starlink. Now it is a profit making venture for the company.

The goal for 2024 is 144 launches.
 
Wow, a lot of news in that presentation. Starship V2 will not be the stretched version, that will be V3 but no details provided about how V2 is different from V1. There is now a completed (?) crew tower at SLC-40 in Florida with the crew arm in place. Second tower will be built at Starbase. New spacesuit being developed for Polaris Dawn EVA will be flexible when under pressure (will have joints?).

Nice to see Elon in a good mood, doing his usual cringeworthy jokes.

IMG_0563.jpeg
IMG_0564.jpeg
IMG_0565.jpeg
 
Can you please explain how the dog leg maneuver has to do anything with the landing location?

I thought it is everything to do with avoiding population centers during launch for some orbits
Over flight/ abort/ RUD is planned for unpopulated areas. The booster follows a ballistic trajectory. Without landing permission in Bahama territorial waters, it would need to fly offset and the second stage would need to expend delta-v getting to 53.
Territorial waters extend to lesser of 200 miles or midpoint from the baseline.
SmartSelect_20240221_174653_Firefox.jpg



SpaceX launches Starlink satellites from California on unusual coast-hugging trajectory – Spaceflight Now
 
SpaceX to locate drone ship off the Bahamas for landing and tourism.
Tourism? We don’t want private boats anywhere near an ASDS! And it seems unlikely that an ASDS would be positioned close enough to shore for viewing opportunities of the actual landing. Maybe the booster will be visible during the final seconds of the descent but it will be a long ways off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grendal