Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

SpaceX F9 - Comm Crew DM-2 - LC-39A

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
  • Informative
Reactions: ggies07 and e-FTW
Just noticed this from Wednesday’s screen grabs. plates read ISSBND...ISS Bound! Both cars had the same plate.

1D931699-5236-4BA6-92E0-09BAF74CB5D0.jpeg
 
They must launch at the moment the ISS orbital path passes over KSC, that is only once a day (heading the correct direction)

Launching at a different time would require an "orbital phase maneuver" to synchronize the orbits once in space, which would add complexity, time, and risk. I'm not sure Dragon is designed to stay attached to the second stage after launch, but for a significant orbital shift they would have to launch into an elliptical orbit with a different period from the ISS, wait until they are synchronized with the plane of the ISS, then fire the second stage again to match the ISS' circular orbit. Dragon has limited life support capability (only a day or two?), and its own thrusters, even Super Dracos, are only capable of a very slight phase shift over that amount of time. (Anyone want to calculate how much?)

Edit: just realized that an orbital phase maneuver is not enough; it only changes phase within a given plane, but here we would need to change the plane altogether, which is even more expensive. The explanation above more describes why they can only launch on certain days, even though the launch site passes through the orbital plane every day.
 
Last edited:
Launching at a different time would require an "orbital phase maneuver" to synchronize the orbits once in space, which would add complexity, time, and risk. I'm not sure Dragon is designed to stay attached to the second stage after launch, but for a significant orbital shift they would have to launch into an elliptical orbit with a different period from the ISS, wait until they are synchronized with the plane of the ISS, then fire the second stage again to match the ISS' circular orbit. Dragon has limited life support capability (only a day or two?), and its own thrusters, even Super Dracos, are only capable of a very slight phase shift over that amount of time. (Anyone want to calculate how much?)

And fuel, lots of fuel...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ben W
Launching at a different time would require an "orbital phase maneuver" to synchronize the orbits once in space, which would add complexity, time, and risk. I'm not sure Dragon is designed to stay attached to the second stage after launch, but for a significant orbital shift they would have to launch into an elliptical orbit with a different period from the ISS, wait until they are synchronized with the plane of the ISS, then fire the second stage again to match the ISS' circular orbit. Dragon has limited life support capability (only a day or two?), and its own thrusters, even Super Dracos, are only capable of a very slight phase shift over that amount of time. (Anyone want to calculate how much?)

AVWeb posted an interview with Paul Dye on this exact topic. Basically, the Falcon 9 doesn’t have the fuel reserve to do an orbital plane change, so it has the instantaneous launch window requirement when meeting up with the ISS.