There is an interesting article in cleantechnica about Sponge, camels and supercharger team.
It is an interesting insight to how big things get done and the authors view is of the SC teams are approaching zero technical or engineering risks. There are logistical challenges, regulatory hurdles, contractor screw-ups, incompetent people and the like, but virtually nothing that would keep a creative innovator entertained for more than a day every week or four in that job. SC team is at that stage.
He goes on to say, The Supercharger business is a mature, steady state operational business. It’s growing rapidly still, but it’s deploying exactly the same product in highly optimized ways using exactly the same processes and software. It’s dealing with challenges, but the challenges aren’t challenges creative people like, they are filling in city approval forms correctly and getting contractors to show up and put wires in place. They are fulfilling orders in a work management system. The sales people have a standard contract that never changes that they sign with hosts.
The Supercharger team, in this analysis, still had a lot of creative people and likely executives. Lots of these were in senior and operational roles. They were quite probably making it really hard for the operational efficiency and ISO 9000 heads to do their jobs. As bored sponges, they were probably creating problems within the Tesla organization instead of delivering Superchargers as effectively, efficiently and cheaply as possible.
The Supercharger kerfuffle should be a clear wakeup call to Teslaâs Board that the organization is in a transition that needs a new quarterback.
cleantechnica.com
These are the authors views I just found it an interesting read than the sexiest view of why Elon fired Tinucci and so on. You may or may not.