Fact Checking
Well-Known Member
So in your world the Koch's right to profit from Canadian tar sands oil fields trumps the property rights, water rights and religious rights of Indian reservation owners, and their rights to peacefully protest the violation of those property rights, water rights and religious rights by the Keystone Pipeline?
The libertarian in you should be deeply upset at this act of using corrupt state power to dispossess privately owned land.
The worries of the property owners were well founded:
Keystone Pipeline Leak Was Twice as Big as Previously Thought | Smart News | Smithsonian
So to make it clear what happened, this is how close the Keystone Pipeline goes to Standing Rock Reservation (Sioux County):
Note that:
- While the pipeline doesn't go through the reservation, any oil spill near the river or the rivers going into Missouri River would pollute the waters and land downstream and thus violate the property rights of the Standing Rock owners of land. Oil spills are not an "if" but a "when" - and the Obama administration recognized it when they stopped federal approval of the project.
- Note the "1851 Treaty Camp" site the pipeline goes straight through - the irony is heavy there.
- Note the section marked as "Archeological sites preemptively bulldozed on Sept. 3" ... a blatant violation of religious rights.
- Note that the earlier pipeline route (dashed line) was rejected by regulators due to the danger to the drinking waters of Bismarck. Violating the water rights of Sioux County instead is ... how democracy works according to @RobStark?